Beatriz v. El Salvador: a loss for eugenic & health grounds for abortion in  international human rights law

Ligia Castaldi

doi:10.21697/CSP.2025.29.1.01

Opublikowane: 2025-12-27

Nr 29 (2025)

Beatriz v. El Salvador: a loss for eugenic & health grounds for abortion in international human rights law

Ligia Castaldi

Chrześcijaństwo-Świat-Polityka

Dział: Temat numeru

https://doi.org/10.21697/CSP.2025.29.1.01

Abstrakt

Beatriz v. El Salvador is an international judgment issued in December 2024 by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights involving a claim against El Salvador’s abortion ban. The Inter-American Court is an international tribunal with jurisdiction over most Latin American and Caribbean countries including El Salvador that oversees enforcement of the American Convention on Human Rights. The treaty contains a unique provision that establishes a “right [to life of every person to] be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception”. That provision has been repeatedly challenged in cases against Costa Rica and El Salvador. Beatriz is the latest judgment in that line of cases.

Poised to become the regional court’s first abortion ruling, Beatriz v. El Salvador challenged El Salvador’s full ban on induced, elective abortion, similar to that of eight other Latin American and Caribbean states parties to the Convention. The case was litigated by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in conjunction with abortion advocacy organizations for more than a decade, leading to a mixed decision by the Inter-American Court that endorsed a progressive interpretation of the right to health and the concept of obstetric violence, but stopped short of creating abortion rights in the American Convention.

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Castaldi, L. (2025). Beatriz v. El Salvador: a loss for eugenic & health grounds for abortion in international human rights law. Chrześcijaństwo-Świat-Polityka, (29), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.21697/CSP.2025.29.1.01

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Abbott S., M. (ed.) (2019), Una visión crítica del sistema Interamericano de Derechos humanos : y algunas propuestas para su mejor funcionamiento, Tirant Lo Blanch, Mexico.
Google Scholar

ACHR (1969), Organization of American States, American Convention on Human Rights, art. 4(1), Nov. 22, 1969, O.A.S.T.S. No. 36, 1144 U.N.T.S. 123 (entered into force July 18, 1978).
Google Scholar

Aldana Aparicio R. K., Quirós J. F. Balmaceda (2023), Disfrazando la verdad: sobre el alegado derecho al aborto a propósito del caso Beatriz y otros vs. El Salvador en la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos [Disguising the truth: about the alleged right to abortion in the case of Beatriz and others v. El Salvador before the Inter-American Human Rights Court], “Prudentia Iuris”, 96: 9-13, https://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/797/7974659008/.
Google Scholar

Bardel D., Vazzano F., Sparaino, M. E. (2024), La interseccionalidad como concepto abarcativo de la Teoría General del Derecho, 45 Cartapacio de Derecho, Unicen, https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/bitstream/handle/11336/254244/CONICET_Digital_Nro.da18f6d2-9265-4f38-a1ee-c844dbe7d0c1_B.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
Google Scholar

Carozza Paolo (2024), La dignidad humana en el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos y el caso “Beatriz y otros vs. El Salvador” [Human dignity in international human rights law and the case of Beatriz and others v. El Salvador],[in:] Débora Ranieri de Cechini, Sofίa Calderone (eds.), El aborto ante la corte IDH: A propósito del caso "Beatriz v.s El Salvador", p. 37–52
Google Scholar

Cianciardo J., Interpretación convencional y populismo. Una aproximación desde el caso “Beatriz” [Treaty interpretation and populism. An analysis from the Beatriz case.], [in:] El aborto ante la Corte IDH: a propósito del caso Beatriz Vs. El Salvador [Abortion before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: about the Beatriz v. El Salvador case], El Derecho 53-79, Buenos Aires.
Google Scholar

Corte Suprema de Justicia (2013a), Sala de lo Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia [Constitutional Chamber of Supreme Court of Justice] May 28, Amparo 310-2013, Centro De Documentación Judicial De Corte Suprema De Justicia de El Salvador.
Google Scholar

Corte Suprema de Justicia (2013b), Sala de lo Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia [Constitutional Chamber of Supreme Court of Justice] May 28, Voto disidente en el caso B.C. Magistrado Florentίn Meléndez [Dissenting vote in case of B.C. Justice Florentίn Meléndez] Amparo 310-2013, Centro De Documentacion Judicial De Corte Suprema.
Google Scholar

Corte Suprema de Justicia (2013c), Sala de lo Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia [Constitutional Chamber of Supreme Court of Justice] May 28, Voto particular concurrente del Magistrado Rodolfo Gonzalez Bonilla [Consurrent separate vote of Justice Rodolfo Gonzalez Bonilla] Amparo 310-2013, Centro De Documentacion Judicial De Corte Suprema De Justicia de El Salvador.
Google Scholar

Corte Suprema de Justicia, Opinion (2013), Opinion of the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic in Sala de lo Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia [Constitutional Chamber of Supreme Court of Justice] May 28, Amparo 310-2013, Centro De Documentación Judicial De Corte Suprema De Justicia de El Salvador.
Google Scholar

CRR (2023), Abortion Rights Defenders Shortlisted for European Parliament Prize for Freedom of Thought, CENTER for REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS (Oct. 12), https://reproductiverights.org/abortion-rights-defenders-nominated-european-parliament-sakharov-prize/.
Google Scholar

Escobar G. (2025a), Lo positivo y lo preocupante: análisis de la sentencia del caso Beatriz vs. El Salvador (parte 1) [The positive and the concerning: analysis of the Beatriz v. El Salvador judgment – part 1], ConParticipacion (Jan. 14), https://conparticipacion.mx/lo-positivo-y-lo-preocupante-analisis-de-la-sentencia-del-caso-beatriz-vs-el-salvador-parte-1/.
Google Scholar

Escobar G.(2025b), Lo positivo y lo preocupante: análisis de la sentencia del caso Beatriz vs. El Salvador (parte 2) [The positive and the concerning: analysis of the Beatriz v. El Salvador judgment – part 2], ConParticipacion (Jan. 16), https://conparticipacion.mx/lo-positivo-y-lo-preocupante-analisis-de-la-sentencia-del-caso-beatriz-vs-el-salvador-parte-2/.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R. Case of Arrom Suhurt et al. v. Paraguay (2019). Merits. Judgment of May 13. Series C No. 377.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Alfonso Martín del Campo Dodd v. Mexico (2004). Preliminary Objections. Judgment of September 3. Series C No. 113.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Artavia Murillo et al. (In Vitro Fertilization) v. Costa Rica (2012). Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 28. Series C No. 257.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Beatriz et al. v. El Salvador (2024a). Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 22, Series C No. 549.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Beatriz et al. v. El Salvador, Opinion (2024b), Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 22. Series C No. 549, Opinion: Judge Sierra Porto.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Brewer Carías v. Venezuela (2014). Preliminary Objections. Judgment of May 26. Series C No. 278.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Brítez Arce et al. v. Argentina (2022). Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 16. Series C No. 474.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Castillo González et al. v. Venezuela (2012). Merits. Judgment of November 27. Series C No. 256.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Cayara v. Peru (1993), Preliminary Objections. Judgment of February 3. Series C No. 14.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Goiburú et al. v. Paraguay (2006). Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 22, Series C No. 153.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers v. Peru. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 8, 2004. Series C No. 110.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Habbal et al. v. Argentina (2022). Preliminary Objections and Merits. Judgment of August 31. Series C No. 463.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Hendrix v. Guatemala (2023) Merits. Judgment of March 7. Series C No. 485.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Manuela et al. v. El Salvador (2021), Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 2. Series C No. 441.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of the Miguel Castro Castro Prison v. Peru (2006). Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 25, Series C No. 160.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Palma Mendoza et al. v. Ecuador (2012). Preliminary Objection and Merits Judgment of September 3. Series C No. 247.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Rico v. Argentina (2019). Preliminary Objection and Merits. Judgment of September 2, Series C No. 383.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of Scot Cochran v. Costa Rica (2023). Preliminary Objections and Merits. Judgment of March 10. Series C No. 486.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Case of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay (2006), Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of March 29. Series C No. 146.
Google Scholar

I/A Court H.R., Matter of B. regarding El Salvador (2013), Provisional Measures. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of August 19.
Google Scholar

IACHR (2020a), Report on Merits N. 9/20. Case 13.378, Beatriz, El Salvador, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.175 Doc. 15 (March 3, 2020), Dissenting Opinion, Commissioner Edgar Stuardo Ralón Orellana.
Google Scholar

IACHR (2020b), Report on Merits N. 9/20. Case 13.378, Beatriz, El Salvador, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.175 Doc. 15 (March 3), https://www.law.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/documents/reprohealth/iacmhr_2020_el_salvador_beatriz_en.pdf.
Google Scholar

IPAS (2021), Steps for performing manual vacuum aspiration using the IPAS MVA Plus and EasyGrip cannulae, Ipas Partners for Reproductive Justice, https://www.ipas.org/resource/steps-for-performing-manual-vacuum-aspiration-using-the-ipas-mva-plus-and-easygrip-cannulae/.
Google Scholar

Lafferriere (2024), Caso Beatriz: Análisis preliminar de la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Centro de Bioética Persona y Familia (Dec. 22), https://centrodebioetica.org/caso-beatriz-analisis-preliminar-de-la-sentencia-de-la-corte-interamericana-de-derechos-humanos/.
Google Scholar

Larín S. (2025), El Salvador deberá pagar $115 mil en indemnizaciones por el Caso Beatriz [El Salvador Will have to pay $115 thousand in reparations for the Beatriz case], Actuall (Jan. 30), https://www.actuall.com/democracia/el-salvador-debera-pagar-115-mil-en-indemnizaciones-por-el-caso-beatri
Google Scholar

Lázaro M.C. L. (2024), La noción de tortura, tratos crueles, inhumanos y degradantes en el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos: consideraciones a propósito del caso ‘Beatriz y otros vs. El Salvador’ [The concept of torture, cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment under international human Rights law: considerations about the case of Beatriz and others v. El Salvador], [in:] El aborto ante la Corte IDH : a propósito del caso Beatriz Vs. El Salvador [Abortion before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: about the Beatriz v. El Salvador case], El Derecho, Buenos Aires.
Google Scholar

Mahtani N. (2023), El giro de Bukele con el aborto, de defenderlo a calificarlo de genocidio [Bukele’s turn on abortion, from defending it to calling it genocide], El País (March 26), https://elpais.com/sociedad/2023-03-26/el-giro-de-bukele-con-el-aborto-de-defenderlo-a-calificarlo-de-genocidio.html.
Google Scholar

Marmora A.B. (2024), Son legítimas las campañas de presión a la Corte IDH en el marco del caso Beatriz vs. El Salvador? [Are pressure campaigns on the IA Court in the context of the Beatriz v. El Salvador case legitimate?] Agenda Estado de Derecho (Dec. 5), https://agendaestadodederecho.com/marco-del-caso-beatriz-vs-el-salvador/.
Google Scholar

Meléndez, IACHR, Rapporteurship on the Rights of Persons Deprived of Liberty and to Prevent and Combat Torture, https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/jsForm/?File=/en/iachr/r/dppl/relator.asp.
Google Scholar

Morello (2019), Pompeo cuts OAS funds over advocacy of legal abortion, The Washington Post (March 26), https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/pompeo-cuts-oas-funds-over-advocacy-of-legal-abortion/2019/03/26/4ea5314d-d7e0-48de-b636-e552447430b0_story.htm.
Google Scholar

Puppinck (2024), The ECHR Condemns Poland to a Cultural Revolution, ECLJ (Jan. 9), https://eclj.org/abortion/echr/la-cedh-condamne-la-pologne-a-la-revolution-culturelle?lng=en.
Google Scholar

Ranieri de Cechini, Calderone (2024), Introducción. Una hoja de ruta del caso ‘Beatriz vs. El Salvador’ [Introduction: a map to the Beatriz v. El Salvador case], [in:] El aborto ante la Corte IDH : a propósito del caso Beatriz Vs. El Salvador [Abortion before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: about the Beatriz v. El Salvador case], Buenos Aires.
Google Scholar

Serrano O. N. (2025), Universality in the Interpretation of International Human Rights Treaties, Ethics Press.
Google Scholar

Wager D. (2023), Professor Paolo Carozza testifies before Inter-American Court of Human Rights in case of Beatriz v. El Salvador, University of Notre Dame Law School (March 30), https://law.nd.edu/news-events/news/march-2023-paolo-carozza-inter-american-court-human-rights-beatriz/.
Google Scholar

YouTube (2020), Nayib Bukele conversa con Residente Calle 13 sobre el aborto, YouTube, yovotovalores (March 24), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJMop8yudNg.
Google Scholar

YouTube (2023a), Audiencia Pública del Caso Beatriz y otros Vs. El Salvador (Jueves) [Public hearing of Beatriz and others v. El Salvador Case, Thursday], Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos at 43:30 (March 23), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-6PIAov2fc&t=5597s.
Google Scholar

YouTube (2023b), Audiencia Pública del Caso Beatriz y otros Vs. El Salvador. Parte 2 [Public hearing of Beatriz and others v. El Salvador Case, Part 2], Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos at 1:27:26 (March 22), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmyQarBpEbg.
Google Scholar

YouTube (2023c), Audiencia Pública del Caso Beatriz y otros Vs. El Salvador. Parte 1 [Public hearing of Beatriz and others v. El Salvador Case, Part 1], Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos at 5:16:30 (March 22), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1A4aqi8-LYY.
Google Scholar

Zambrano P. (2024), ’Artavia Murillo’, ‘Beatriz’, y la disolución del Rule of Law [Artavia Murillo, Beatriz and the dissolution of the rule of law], [in:] El aborto ante la Corte IDH : a propósito del caso Beatriz Vs. El Salvador [Abortion before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: about the Beatriz v. El Salvador case], El Derecho, Buenos Aires.
Google Scholar