Littera commendatitiae (celebret) – czy to środek jedynie do ochrony świętości Najświętszej Ofiary i sakramentu Eucharystii?

Jerzy Adamczyk

doi:10.21697/pk2026.69.3.01

Published: 2026-09-28

Vol. 69 No. 3 (2026)

The Littera commendatitiae (commendatory letter) – Is it Solely a Means of Protecting the Sanctity of the Most Holy Sacrifice and the Sacrament of the Eucharist?

Jerzy Adamczyk

Prawo Kanoniczne

Section: Articles and dissertations

https://doi.org/10.21697/pk2026.69.3.01

Abstract

The problem addressed: Church law places great importance on ensuring that Mass is celebrated validly and licitly. Therefore, regulations are issued that govern, among other things, the authorization of priests who are not known to the rector of a given church to celebrate Mass. This article attempts to answer the questions of whether the current regulations regarding the littera commendatitiae are sufficient today for effective protection of the Eucharist, and also about the role of the littera commendatitiae in contemporary realities.

The aim of the research conducted: The purpose of this study is to examine the legal texts concerning the role of the littera commendatitiae in the context of a valid and licit celebration of Mass, and to answer the question of whether the role of the codex-based littera commendatitiae should be expanded to other areas in today's circumstances.

Methods: The study primarily employs a dogmatic-legal method, as well as analytical and synthetic methods, and partially a historical method.

The results of the research: Regulations regarding the littera commendatitiae date back to ancient Christianity. The current Code of Canon Law (CIC) adopts the law on the littera commendatitiae from can. 804 of the 1917 CIC, but significantly simplifies it. It must be stated that the role of the littera commendatitiae in current canon law is insufficient in today's circumstances.

The conclusions drawn from the research: Based on the analyses conducted, it should be noted that in the age of technological development and the high mobility of clergy, the littera commendatitiae in the form of a codex-based "commendatory letter" is insufficient, and its annual renewal makes it even less reliable. It should be modernized to become a more effective tool in protecting the Eucharist. Today's littera commendatitiae should be a certificate of a priest's ability to celebrate other sacraments and other acts of divine worship. The littera commendatitiae should also include references to the protection of children and adolescents from sexual abuse by clergy. Therefore, a "modern" littera commendatitiae should be "expanded" to also address the issue of ensuring safety within the Church.

Keywords:

Mass, bishop, celebret, parish priest, priest

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Adamczyk, J. (2026). The Littera commendatitiae (commendatory letter) – Is it Solely a Means of Protecting the Sanctity of the Most Holy Sacrifice and the Sacrament of the Eucharist?. Prawo Kanoniczne, 69(3), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.21697/pk2026.69.3.01

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Sources
Google Scholar

Archbishop of Cape Town. Celebret. The testimonial below, from Cardinal Stephen Brislin, indicates the Diocesan Priests of the Archdiocese of Cape Town who are in good standing, 1.11.2024. https://adct.org.za/celebret. Accesed: 18 November 2024.
Google Scholar

Benedictus PP XIV. Litterae encyclicae Quam grave, 2.08.1757. In Codicis iuris canonici fontes. 1948. Vol. 2, edited by Petrus Gasparri, n. 549-554. Città del Vaticano: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
Google Scholar

Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium auctoritate Ioannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus, 18.10.1990. AAS 82 (1990): 1034-1363. Translation: Kodeks Kanonów Kościołów Wschodnich. 2002. Edited by Leszek Adamowicz and Marzena Dyjakowska. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Archidiecezji Lubelskiej “Gaudium” (=CCEO).
Google Scholar

Codex Iuris Canonici auctoritate Joannis Pauli PP. promulgatus, 25.01.1983. AAS 75/II (1983): V-XXX. 1-317. Translation: Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego promulgowany przez papieża Jana Pawła II w dniu 25 stycznia 1983 roku. Zaktualizowany przekład na język polski. 2022. Poznań: Palllottinum (=CIC).
Google Scholar

Concilium Oecumenicum Chalcedonense. Κανονες, 451. Translation: Sobór Chalcedoński. Kanony. In Nicea. Konstantynopol I. Efez. Chalcedon. Konstantynopol II. Konstantynopol III. Nicea II (325-787). Vol 1 of Dokumenty Soborów Powszechnych. Tekst grecki, łaciński, polski. 2002. Edited by Arkadiusz Baron i Henryk Pietras, 224-257. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM (=Chalc.).
Google Scholar

ConciliumTridentinum. Decreta super reformatione, 15.07.1563. Translation: Sobór Trydnecki. Dekrety o reformie. In Lateran V. Trydent. Watykan II. Vol. 4 of Dokumenty Soborów Powszechnych. Tekst łaciński i polski. 2004. Edited by Arkadiusz Baron i Henryk Pietras, 687-713. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM (=Tryd.).
Google Scholar

Conférence des Evêques de France. Création d'une carte d’identification et de celebret, 10.05.2023. Dossier de Presse 2023 (=CEF).
Google Scholar

Congregatio de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum. Instructio Redemptionis sacramentum. De quibusdam observandis et vitandis circa Sanctissimam Eucharistiam, 25.03.2004. AAS 96 (2004): 549-601. Translation: Kongregacja ds. Kultu Bożego i Dyscypliny Sakramentów. 2004. Instrukcja Redemptionis sacramentum. Poznań: Pallottinum (=RS).
Google Scholar

Franciscus. Costituzione Apostolica sulla Curia Romana e il suo servizio alla Chiesa nel mondo Praedicate Evangelium, 19.03. 2022. AAS 114 (2022): 375-455 (=PE).
Google Scholar

Missale Romanum ex decreto sacrocancti Oecumenici Concilii Vaticani II instauratum, auctoritate Pauli Pp. VI promulgatum, Ioannis Paulis Pp. II cura recognitum. Editio typica tertia, 20.04.2000. Città del Vaticano: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis. Transaltion: Kongregacja Kultu Bożego i Dyscypliny Sakramentów. 2004. Nowe ogólne wprowadzenie do Mszału rzymskiego. Poznań: Pallottinum (=NOWMR).
Google Scholar

Pontificia Commissio Codici luris Canonici Recognoscendo. 1981. „Coetus studiorum. Coetus De Sacramentis. De sanctissima eucharistia”. Communicationes 13(1): 237-245 (=PCCICR).
Google Scholar

Pontificia Commissio Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo. 1999. „Coetus studiorum. De Sacramentis (Sessio VI)”. Communicationes 31(1): 116-163 (=PCCICR).
Google Scholar

Sacrosanctum Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum II. Constitutio dogmatica de Ecclesia Lumen Gentium, 21.11.1965, AAS 57 (1964): 5-71, Transaltion: Sobór Watykański II. Konstytucja dogmatyczna o Kościele Lumen Gentium. In Sobór Watykański II. 2002. Konstytucje, dekrety, deklaracje, 104-166. Poznań: Pallottinum (=LG).
Google Scholar

Sacrosanctum Concilium Oecumenicum Vaticanum II. Decretum Presbyterorum ordinis de presbyterorum ministerio et vita, 7.12.1965. AAS 58 (1966): 991-1024. Translation: Sobór Watykański II. Dekret Presbyterorum ordinis o posłudze i życiu kapłanów. In Sobór Watykański II. 2002. Konstytucje, dekrety, deklaracje, 478-507. Poznań: Pallotinum (=PO).
Google Scholar

Święta Kongregacja Nauki Wiary. List do biskupów Kościoła katolickiego o niektórych zagadnieniach dotyczących szafarza Eucharystii, 6.08.1983. In: W trosce o pełnię wiary. Dokumenty Kongregacji Nauki Wiary 1966-1994. 1997. Edited by Janusz Królikowski and Zygmunt Zimowski, 202-207. Tarnów: Biblos (=ŚKNW).
Google Scholar

The Catholic Safeguarding Standards Agency in England and Wales. Policy and procedure – The Temporary Ministry of Priests within England and Wales, 04. 2021. http://buckfast.org.uk/wp-contGnt/uploads/2023/05/Final-Policy-and-ProcGdurG-ThG-tGmporary-ministry-of-priests-within-England-and-Wal. Accesed: 18 October 2025 (=PeP).
Google Scholar

Literature
Google Scholar

Althaus, Rüdiger. 2004. “Der Diener der heiligsten Eucharistie”. In Münsterischer Kommentar zum Codex Iuris Canonici, edited by Klaus Lüdicke, Band 4, 900/1-911/4. Essen: Ludgerus Verlag.
Google Scholar

Erdö, Péter. 2002. “Del ministro de la santísima Eucaristía”. In Comentario exegético al Código de Derecho Canónico. Vol. 3.1. 3th ed., edited by Ángel Marzoa, Jorge Miras, and Rafael Rodríguez-Ocaña, 591-619. Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, S.A.
Google Scholar

Górecki, Edward. 2011. “Szafarz Najświętszej Eucharystii”. In Księga IV. Uświęcające zadanie Kościoła. Vol 3.2 of Komentarz do Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego, edited by Józef Krukowski, 88-97. Poznań: Pallottinum.
Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, José Luis. 2012. “Comendaticias [letras o cartas]”, In Diccionario General de Derecho Canónico. Vol. 2, edited by Javier Otaduy, Antonio Viana, and Joaquin Sedano, 239-240. Pamplona: Editorial Aranzadi.
Google Scholar

Huels, John. 2000. “The Minister of the Most Holy Eucharist (cc. 900-911)”. In New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law, edited by John Beal, 1097-1107. New York: Paulist Press International.
Google Scholar

Mingardi, Massimo. 2012. “L'Eucaristia: la celebrazione e la custodia”. Quaderni di diritto ecclesiale 3(2): 106-122.
Google Scholar

Miragoli, Egidio. 1994. “Il celebret”. Quaderni di diritto ecclesiale 7(4): 435-442.
Google Scholar

Palumbo, Paolo. 2024. “Il celebret tra tradizione e innovazione digitale. Considerazioni e prospettive a partire da recenti casi di cronaca”. https//www.rivistadiritlocreligioni.com/. Accessed: 29 April 2025.
Google Scholar

Pastuszko, Marian. 1983. “Celebrans ofiary eucharystycznej”. Prawo Kanoniczne 26(1-2): 203-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.1983.26.1-2.04
Google Scholar

Pastuszko, Marian. 1994. “Szafarstwo Najświętszej Eucharystii (kanony 897-911)”. Prawo Kanoniczne 37(1-2): 73-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.1994.37.1-2.04
Google Scholar

Romano, Francesco. 2008. “Dimensione pubblica ed ecclesiale del diritto alla buona fama e la sua tutela penale nei cann. 220 e 1390 §§ 2-3 del CIC”. Teresianum 59: 285-313.
Google Scholar

Szwagrzyk, Tadeusz 1959. “Dopuszczenie obcego kapłana do ołtarza”. Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny 12(1): 52-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.2701
Google Scholar