Sources
Google Scholar
Conférence des Évêques de Belgique. 2017. Amoris Lætitia. Des chemins d’accompagnement pour les familles. https://www.cathobel.be/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2017-05-09-Amoris-laetitia-Lettre-pastorale.pdf. Accessed: 21 January 2026 (=CEB).
Google Scholar
Conferencia Episcopal Española. 2017. Decreto general sobre la protección de datos de la Iglesia católica en España. https://documentos.conferenciaepiscopal.es/flora/jsp/view/view_diaporama_report.jsp?recordId=cee:DOCUS:1164. Accessed: 20 January 2026 (=CEE).
Google Scholar
Conferenza Episcopale Italiana. 2018. Decreto generale sulle disposizioni per la tutela del diritto alla buona fama e alla riservatezza. Notiziario 52. https://giuridico.chiesacattolica.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/37/07-2018_05_Decreto-generale-privacy_OK.pdf. Accessed: 20 January 2026 (=CEI).
Google Scholar
Deutsche Bischofskonferenz. 2017a. Gesetz über den Kirchlichen Datenschutz.
Google Scholar
https://www.katholisches-datenschutzzentrum.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/KDG-Beschlussfasssung-der-Vollversammlung-der-BK-vom-20.11.2017.pdf. Accessed: 20 January 2026 (=DBK).
Google Scholar
Deutsche Bischofskonferenz. 2017b. Die Freude der Liebe, die in den Familien gelebt wird, ist auch die Freude der Kirche, 1.02.2017. https://www.dbk.de/fileadmin/redaktion/diverse_downloads/presse_alt/presse_2017/2017-015a-Wortlaut-Wort-der-Bischoefe-Amoris-laetitia.pdf. Accessed: 21 January 2026 (=DBK).
Google Scholar
Franciscus. Adhortatio apostolica post-synodalis Amoris lætitia de amore in familia, 19.03.2016. AAS 108 (2016): 312–446.
Google Scholar
Konferencja Episkopatu Polski. 2018a. Dekret ogólny w sprawie ochrony danych osób fizycznych w związku z przetwarzaniem danych osobowych w Kościele katolickim. Akta Konferencji Episkopatu Polski 30. https://episkopat.pl/files/24.bkt/10/16/15/087154_KQCY_OsobowychWKoscieleKatolickim.pdf. Accessed: 20 January 2026 (=KEP).
Google Scholar
Konferencja Episkopatu Polski.2018b Wytyczne pastoralne do adhortacji apostolskiej papieża Franciszka Amoris Lætitia, 8.07.2018. https://www.ekai.pl/dokumenty/wytyczne-pastoralne-do-adhortacji-amoris-laetitia/. Accessed: 21 January 2026 (=KEP).
Google Scholar
Konferencja Episkopatu Polski. 2018c. Dekret ogólny dotyczący sporządzania i modyfikacji aktu chrztu w związku z przysposobieniem, 19.07.2018. https://episkopat.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/DekretOgolnyKEPDotyczacySporzadzeniaIModyfikacjiAktuChrztuWZwiazkuZPrzysposobieniem.pdf. Accessed: 21 January 2026 (=KEP).
Google Scholar
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2000. Complementary Legislation for Canon 877, §3 of the Code of Canon Law for the Latin Rite of the United States, 20.10.2000.
Google Scholar
https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/what-we-believe/canon-law/complementary-norms/canon-877-3-recording-the-baptism-of-adopted-children. Accessed: 21 January 2026 (=USCCB).
Google Scholar
Literature
Google Scholar
Álvarez de las Asturias, Nicolás. 2011. “Derecho canónico y codificación: Alcance y límites de la asunción de una técnica.” Ius Canonicum 51: 105-136. https://doi.org/10.15581/016.51.2595.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/016.51.2595
Google Scholar
Arroba Conde, Manuel J., ed.1996. Manuale di diritto canonico. Città del Vaticano: Lateran University Press.
Google Scholar
Baasch Andersen, Camilla. 2007. “Defining Uniformity in Law.” Uniform Law Review 12(1): 5-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/12.1.5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/12.1.5
Google Scholar
Baura, Edoardo. 2013. Parte generale del diritto canonico. Diritto e sistema normativo. Roma: ESC Ed.
Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Bertotto, Francesco. 2022. Analogia e diritto nella Chiesa. Venezia: Marcianum Press.
Google Scholar
Buksiński, Tadeusz. 2015. “Monocentrism and Multicentrism as Legal Theories in the Global Era.” Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej 1: 5-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2015.1.5
Google Scholar
Calasso, Francesco. 1954. Medioevo del diritto. Vol. 1: Le fonti. Milano: Giuffrè Ed.
Google Scholar
Cassola, Ottavio. 1969. La recezione del diritto civile nel diritto canonico. Roma: Libreria Editrice della Pontificia Università Lateranense.
Google Scholar
Cattaneo, Arturo. 2011. Fondamenti ecclesiologici del diritto canonico. Venezia: Marcinanum Press.
Google Scholar
Ciechanowska, Joanna, and Katarzyna Szwed. 2021. “Protection of Personal Data in the Catholic Church in the Light of the EU Regulation no. 2016/679.” Kościół i Prawo 23(2): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.18290/kip21102.2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/kip21102.2
Google Scholar
Ciprotti, Pio. 1983. Il nuovo Codice di diritto canonico: novità, motivazione e significato. Roma: Libreria Editrice della Pontificia Università Lateranense.
Google Scholar
Copp, David. 2019. Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Corecco, Eugenio. 1991. Diritto canonico. Milano: Giappichelli.
Google Scholar
Culver, Keith, and Michael Giudice. 2013. “Making Old Questions New: Legality, Legal System, and Law.” In Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law, edited by Wil Waluchow and Stefan Sciaraffa, 279-299, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199675517.003.0013
Google Scholar
d’Arienzo, Maria, ed. 2025. Manuale di diritto canonico. Torino: Giappichelli.
Google Scholar
Ganarin, Marco. 2018. “Salvaguardia dei dati sensibili di natura religiosa e autonomia confessionale.” Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale 11: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.13130/1971-8543/9912.
Google Scholar
Ganarin, Marco. 2018. “Specificità canonistiche e implicazioni ecclesiastiche del nuovo Decreto generale della Conferenza Episcopale Italiana sulla tutela del diritto alla buona fama e alla riservatezza.” Quaderni di diritto e politica ecclesiastica 2: 581–618.
Google Scholar
Hervada, Javier. 1981. Introducción crítica al derecho canónico. Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.
Google Scholar
Kroczek, Piotr. 2009. “The Theological Foundations of the Reception of Canon Law.” Annales Canonici 5: 169–174.
Google Scholar
Kroczek, Piotr, and Piotr Skonieczny, eds. 2022. Ochrona danych osobowych w Kościele katolickim. Vol. 1. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II w Krakowie. https://doi.org/10.15633/9788363241308.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15633/9788363241308
Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. 2007. “The Rule of Law: Legality, Teleology, Sociology.” UNSW Law Research Series 65: 1-29.
Google Scholar
Lipari, Niccolò. 2008. Le fonti del diritto. Milano: Giuffrè Ed.
Google Scholar
Liżewski, Bartosz. 2019. „Cecha jednolitości systemu prawa w warunkach multicentryzmu.” Annales Universitatis Mariæ Curie-Skłodowska Lublin - Polonia, Sectio G, 66: 221-234. https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2019.66.1.221-236.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2019.66.1.221-236
Google Scholar
Michowicz, Przemysław. 2023. “Problem multicentryczności systemu prawa kanonicznego.” Roczniki Nauk Prawnych 33(4): 83–98. http://doi.org/10.18290/rnp23334.5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rnp23334.5
Google Scholar
Mostacci, Edoardo. 2008. La soft law nel sistema delle fonti: Uno studio comparato. Padova: CEDAM.
Google Scholar
Mörsdorf, Klaus. 1964. Lehrbuch des Kirchenrechts. 1st ed. München: Brill.
Google Scholar
Otaduy, Javier. 1998. “La comunidad como fuente de derecho.” Ius Ecclesiae 9(1): 37–87.
Google Scholar
Otaduy, Javier. 2017. “Dulcor Misericordiae.” Ius Canonicum 57: 153-201. https://doi.org/10.15581/016.113.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/016.113.004
Google Scholar
Otaduy, Javier. 2019. “El decreto general de la Conferencia Episcopal Española en materia de protección de datos personales.” Ius Ecclesiae 31(2): 471–498. https://doi.org/10.19272/201908602004.
Google Scholar
Örsy, Ladislas. 1987. The Church: Learning and Teaching. Washington, DC: Michael Glazier.
Google Scholar
Örsy, Ladislas. 1992. Theology and Canon Law: New Horizons for Legislation and Interpretation. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
Google Scholar
Paprocki, Thomas J. 2022. “Seeking Eucharistic Coherence in an Era of Incoherence.” The Jurist 78: 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1353/jur.2022.0023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jur.2022.0023
Google Scholar
Sabbarese, Luigi. 2022. Manuale di diritto canonico. 7th ed. Molfetta: Neldiritto Editore.
Google Scholar
Schouppe, Jean-Pierre. 2013. “Beneficio eclesiástico.” In Diccionario General de Derecho Canónico. Vol. 1, edited by Javier Otaduy, Antonio Viana, and Joaquín Sedano, 661-663, Pamplona: Cizur Menor.
Google Scholar
Skonieczny, Piotr. 2018. “Zakres podmiotowy Dekretu ogólnego KEP z 13 marca 2018 roku.” Annales Canonici 14(1): 69-86. https://doi.org/10.15633/acan.2474.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15633/acan.2474
Google Scholar
Sobański, Remigiusz. 1992. Teoria prawa kościelnego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2001. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244676.001.0001
Google Scholar
Wróbel, Adam. 2024. “An Axiological Turn in European Constitutionalism?.” Polish Yearbook of International Law 44: 203–234. 10.24425/pyil.2025.156720.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/pyil.2025.156720
Google Scholar
Zirk-Sadowski, Marek. 1998. Prawo a uczestniczenie w kulturze. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Żmigrodzki, Marek. 2011. Jednolitość aksjologiczna systemu prawa. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2026.69.2.03
English
Język Polski
Italiano
Español (España)