De concordia inter Codices - Zgoda między kodeksami

MICHAŁ SIENNICKI

doi:10.21697/pk.2019.62.1.08

Published: 2019-03-09

Vol. 62 No. 1 (2019)

De concordia inter Codices - Consent between codes

MICHAŁ SIENNICKI

Prawo Kanoniczne

Section: Rozprawy i Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2019.62.1.08

Abstract

Apostolic Letter issued 'Motu Proprio' “De concordia inter Codices” modifying some norms of the Code of Canon Law

The following article attempts to explain the reasons why the Supreme Legislator of the Church has decided to promulgate the apostolic letter in the form of a motu proprio, De concorida inter Codices. It presents a brief history of the preparation of the text and the problems concerning its promulgation, both for the universal Church and in the particular case of Poland. The author of the article tries to show the need for knowledge of the new canonical norm already desired by Pope Benedict and finally promulgated by Pope Francis. Canonical science cannot be limited only to the Latin code but must go beyond this to the Eastern code, especially when it comes to matters of marriage and its validity, the sacrament of baptism and enrolment in a Church sui iuris. These are indispensable elements of canonical science that every pastor of the Church must possess and especially those who meet the Eastern faithful in their pastoral circumstances. It is to be hoped that canonical science will help to give pastoral care to all the faithful who await it.

Keywords:

Church sui iuris, Eastern code, marriage in Eastern code, pastoral care, De concorida inter Codices

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

SIENNICKI, M. (2019). De concordia inter Codices - Consent between codes . Prawo Kanoniczne, 62(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2019.62.1.08

Cited by / Share

References

Bibliografia
Google Scholar

Źródła
Google Scholar

AAS 108(2016), s.602-606.
Google Scholar

Communicationes 43(2011), 315-316.
Google Scholar

Communicationes 43(2011), s. 315-316.
Google Scholar

Insegnamenti di Giovani Paolo II, XIII,2, s.936-937.
Google Scholar

Ioannes Paulus II, Allocutio ad Episcopos, w: L'Osservatore Romano 23 listopada 1983.
Google Scholar

List Apostolski w formie motu proprio De concorida inter Codices,w: L'Osservatore Romano 16 września 2016. (odtąd Concorida inter Codices).
Google Scholar

Literatura
Google Scholar

Baleani C., I requisiti di attuabilità dell'istituto giuridico del passaggio: il principio generale e il consenso, in: Commentarium pro religiosis et missionariis 80(1990), s. 128-154.
Google Scholar

Communicationes 43(2011), 315-316.
Google Scholar

Gefaell P., Commenti al M.P. De concorida inter Codices, in: Ius Ecclesiae 29(2017), s. 160.
Google Scholar

Gefaell P., La correlazione tra CIC'83 e CCEO'90 alla luce della "nota explicativa" del 2011, w: Il diritto canonico orientale a cinquant'anni dal Concilio Vaticano II, Kanonica 22(2016), p. 281-289.
Google Scholar

Lombardia P., Komentarz do kan. 7 w: Codex Iuris Canonici. Kodeks prawa kanonicznego. Komentarz., red. P. Majer, edycja polska na podstawie wydania hiszpańskiego, Kraków 2011, s. 70.
Google Scholar

Navarro Valls R., Komentarz do kan. 1109 w: w: Codex Iuris Canonici. Kodeks prawa kanonicznego. Komentarz., red. P. Majer, edycja polska na podstawie wydania hiszpańskieg, Kraków 2011, s. 836.
Google Scholar

Prader J., Il matrimonio in Oriente e in Occidente, 2a ed.,Roma, PIO, 2003 (Kanonicam,1), s.266).
Google Scholar

Ruyssen G., Il decreto conciliare Unitatis Redintegratio e la sua incidenza sulla communicatio in sacris con gli ortodossi. Evoluzione della disciplina, w: Il diritto canonico orientale a cinquant'anni dal Concilio Vaticano II, Kanonica 22(2016), p. 63-122.
Google Scholar

Sabbarese L., L'amministrazione straordinaria dei beni ecclesiastici nel CCEO: un aggiornamento mancato, w: Il diritto canonico orientale a cinquant'anni dal Concilio Vaticano II, Kanonica 22(2016), p. 231-248.
Google Scholar

Salachas D.- Nitkiewicz K., Inter-Ecclesial Relations between Eastern and Latin Catholics: A Canonical-Pastoral Handbook, angielska wersja w edycji George Dimitry Gallaro, Washington DC, CLSA, 2009, s. 29.
Google Scholar