Stein’s Anthropological Approach to the Humanities

Piotr Janik

doi:10.21697/spch.2023.59.A.11

Opublikowane: 2023-12-31

Tom 59 Nr 2 (2023)

Stein’s Anthropological Approach to the Humanities

Piotr Janik

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

Dział: Artykuły naukowe

https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2023.59.A.11

Abstrakt

Should we approach the lived experience and/or understand the other with the sense of things? If this is the case, how are we to treat the human experience par excellence? Paradoxically, Edith Stein gives a fresh meaning to the Husserlian term “leibliche
Selbstgegebenheit.” In contrast to Max Scheler’s account, she develops the “persönliche Note” criterion of authenticity. And against Maetin Heidegger’s existential philosophy, a concern for human existence itself resonates. Based on these three dimensions, this article discusses the idea of “the lived experience” according to Edith Stein, that is, the human experience contemplated by the humanities.

--------------------------

Received: 03/02/2023. Reviewed: 16/03/2023. Accepted: 30/03/2023.

Słowa kluczowe:

lived experience, human experience, leibliche Selbstgegebenheit, persönliche Note, authenticity, value, empathy, existence, a-subjective Dasein, Edith Stein, Roman Ingarden, Martin Heidegger, Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler, Jan Patočka

Inne teksty tego samego autora

Piotr Janik, O sensowności uczuć. Dziedzictwo myśli Edyty Stein , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 56 Nr 2 (2020)

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Janik, P. (2023). Stein’s Anthropological Approach to the Humanities. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 59(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2023.59.A.11

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Beckmann-Zöller, B. (2010). Einführung, In: E. Stein. Beiträge zur philosophischen Begründung der Psychology und der Geisteswissenschaften, IX-XCII. Freiburg – Basel – Wien: Herder.
Google Scholar

Bello, A.A. (2015). The Sense of Things. Toward a Phenomenological Realism. Analecta Husserliana. The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15395-7.
Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (2009). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Brudzińska, J. (2018). Lived body and intentional embodiment. New perspectives on phenomenological anthropology. Dialogue and Universalism, 4, 245-59.
Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (2018). Truth and Method. London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Ingarden, R. (1966). Czego nie wiemy o wartościach. In: R. Ingarden, Przeżycie, dzieło, wartość, 83-127. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Ingarden, R. (1971). O badaniach filozoficznych Edith Stein. Znak, 23(4), 389-409. Available in German: Ingarden, R. (1979). Über die philosophischen Forschungen Edith Steins. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, 26(2-3), 456-480. Reprinted: Ingarden, R. (1999). Gesammelte Werke: Band 3: Schriften zur frühen Phänomenologie. Bd. 3, 228-255. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110916195.228.
Google Scholar

Ingarden, R. (2009). Człowiek i czas. In: Ingarden, Książeczka o człowieku, 39-69. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Janik, P. (2021a). Ingarden’s Legacy: Responsibility as Legal and Beyond. In: D. Czakon, N.A. Michna, L. Sosnowski (eds.), Roman Ingarden and Our Times. Recent Trends in Phenomenology and Contemporary Philosophy, 33-44. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka Publishing.
Google Scholar

Janik, P. (2021b). Irrealia: F. Suárez’s concept of being in the formulation of intentionality from F. Brentano to J. Patočka and beyond. In: P. Janik, C. Canullo (eds.), Intentionnalité comme idée. Phenomenon, between efficacy and analogy, 31-45. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka Publishing. https://doi.org/10.12797/9788381385978.02.
Google Scholar

Janik, P. (2021c). The Matrix, or when the natural world is scary. In: P. Janik, C. Canullo (eds.), Intentionnalité comme idée. Phenomenon, between efficacy and analogy, 163-179. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka Publishing. https://doi.org/10.12797/9788381385978.09.
Google Scholar

Lebech, M. (2008). Stein’s Phenomenology of the Body: The Constitution of the Human Being between Description of Experience and Social Construction. Maynooth Philosophical Papers, 5, 16-20.
Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Moore, G.E. (1903). Reviewed Work: The Origin of The Knowledge of Right and Wrong by Franz Brentano. International Journal of Ethics, 14(1), 115-123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2376027.
Google Scholar

Pugliese, A. (2018). Play and self-reflection. Eugen Fink’s phenomenological anthropology. Dialogue and Universalism, 4, 213-229.
Google Scholar

Scheler, M. (2017). The Nature of Sympathy. Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Stein, E. (2007). Martin Heidegger’s Existential Philosophy. Maynooth Philosophical Papers, 4, 55-98. [German version: Stein, E. (2006). Martin Heideggers Existentialphilosophie. In: E. Stein, Endliches und Ewiges Sein. Versuch eines Aufstiegs zum Sinn des Seins, Gesamtausgabe, bd. 11/12, ‘Anhang’, 445-500. Freiburg: Herder].
Google Scholar

Stein, E. (2008). Selbstbildnis in Briefen III. Briefe an Roman Ingarden. ESGA 4. Freiburg i. Br.: Herder.
Google Scholar

Stein, E. (2010). Beiträge zur philosophischen Begründung der Psychology und der Geisteswissenschaften, Freiburg – Basel – Wien: Herder. [Original German edition: Stein, E. (1922). Beiträge zur philosophischen Begründung der Psychology und der Geisteswissenschaften. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 5, 1-283]. English translation: Stein, E. (2000). Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities. Washington DC: ICS Publications.
Google Scholar