Some remarks on the significance of paradox for science in the context of photometric paradox case

Adam Świeżyński

doi:10.21697/2018.54.4.05

Published: 2019-11-08

Vol. 54 No. 4 (2018)

Some remarks on the significance of paradox for science in the context of photometric paradox case

Adam Świeżyński

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

Section: Papers

https://doi.org/10.21697/2018.54.4.05

Abstract

A paradox is an argument that produces an inconsistency, typically within logic or common sense. Most paradoxes are known to be invalid arguments but are still valuable in promoting critical thinking. In astrophysics and physical cosmology, Olbers’ paradox (photometric; “dark night-sky”), named after German scholar Heinrich Olbers, is the argument that the darkness of the night sky conflicts with the assumption of an infinite and eternal static universe. If the universe is static and populated by an infinite number of stars, any sight line from Earth must end at the bright surface of a star, so the night sky should be completely bright. This contradicts the observed darkness of the night. Modern research on the essence of the photometric paradox (and attempts to neutralize it undertaken in the history of science) lead to the conclusion that its paradoxicality is resulting primarily from the precedence of human thought (ideas, theories) in relation to the possibility of its proper empirical verification. Therefore, the paradox of “dark night-sky” and attempts to overcome it may be instructive proof that something so plain and obvious, as available to anyone look at the starry night sky, sometimes, for respectively keen observer, give an opportunity to look ahead much further (and sometimes more accurately to reality) than empirical research allow at the moment. The photometric paradox created an opportunity for the unveiling of a new cognitive horizon by exceeding the existing scheme of thought and thereby acquiring new scientific knowledge, enriching the knowledge gained so far and deepening our understanding of Universe.

Keywords:

paradox, photometric paradox, Olbers’ paradox, scientific knowledge, cosmology, cosmological models

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Świeżyński, A. (2019). Some remarks on the significance of paradox for science in the context of photometric paradox case. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 54(4), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.21697/2018.54.4.05

Cited by / Share

References

Belinfante F.J., Correction of a misunderstanding about Olbers’ paradox, General Relativity and Gravitation 1(1975), 9–12.
Google Scholar

Bondi H., Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1952.
Google Scholar

Bondi H., Theories of cosmology, Advancement of Science 12(1955), 33–38.
Google Scholar

Cappi A., The Evolving Universe of Edgar Allan Poe, in: Cosmology through Time, Mimesis, Milano 2003, 239–246.
Google Scholar

Chaseaux J.P.L. de, Traite’ de la Comete, M.M. Bousequet, Lausanne 1744.
Google Scholar

Clark M., Paradoxes from A to Z, Routledge, London 2002.
Google Scholar

Clerke A.M., The System of the Stars, Longmans, Green and co., London 1890.
Google Scholar

Conselice Ch. J., Wilkinson A., Duncan K., Mortlock A., The evolution of galaxy number density z<8 and its implications, The Astrophysical Journal (2016)830(2), 1–12.
Google Scholar

Cucić D., Astrophysical paradoxes, 2008, http://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.1679; (download: 30.09.2017).
Google Scholar

Cucić D., Paradox in physics, the consistency of inconsistency (long version), 2008, http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2541; (download: 30.09.2017).
Google Scholar

Cucić D., Types of Paradox in Physics, 2009, http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1864; (download: 30.09.2017).
Google Scholar

Digges T., A Perfit Description of the Celestiall Orbs according to the most aunciente doctrine of the Pythagoreans, latelye revived by Copernicus and by Geometricall Demonstrations approved, in: L. Digges, Prognostication Everlastinge (…) Lately corrected and augmented by Thomas Digges, T. Marsh, London 1576 [L. Digges, A prognostication everlastinge: Corrected and augmented by Thomas Digges, W.J. Johnson, Amsterdam 1975].
Google Scholar

Engels F., Dialectics of Nature, International Publishers, New York 1940.
Google Scholar

Gontcharov G.A., Interstellar Extinction, Astrophysics 59(2016), 548–579.
Google Scholar

Gribbin J., Olbers’ Paradox: Why is the Sky Dark at Night?, Astronomy Now 2(1988)3, 9–12.
Google Scholar

Halley E., Of the infinity of the sphere of fix’d stars, Philosophical Transactions 31(1720–1721), 22–24.
Google Scholar

Halley E.R., Of the number, order, and light of the fix’d stars, Philosophical Transactions 31(1720–1721), 24–26.
Google Scholar

Harrison E.R., Olbers’ paradox and the background radiation density in an isotropic homogeneous Universe, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 131 (1965), 1–12.
Google Scholar

Harrison E.R., Why the sky is dark at night, Physics Today 30(1974)2, 30–36.
Google Scholar

Harrison E.R., Cosmology. The Science of the Universe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – London – New York – New Rochelle – Melbourne – Sydney 1981.
Google Scholar

Harrison E.R., Darkness at Night. A Riddle of the Universe, Harvard University Press, Cambridge – London 1987.
Google Scholar

Harrison E.R., The dark night-sky riddle, “Olbers paradox”, in: The Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation. Proceedings of the 139th Symposium of the International Astronomical Union Held in Heidelberg, F.R.G., June 12–16, 1989, ed. S. Bowyer, C. Lienert, International Astronomical Union – Kluwer, Dordrecht 1990, 3–17.
Google Scholar

Harrison E.R., Olbers’s Paradox in Recent Times, in: Modern Cosmology in Retrospect, eds. B. Bertotti, S. Bergia, A. Messina, Cambridge Univeristy Press, Cambridge 1990, 34–45.
Google Scholar

Herschel J., Outlines of Astronomy, Lee and Blanchard, Philadelphia 1849.
Google Scholar

Humboldt A. von, Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, vol. 1, trans. E. C. Otte, Harper, New York 1858 (1845).
Google Scholar

Jaki S.L., The Paradox of Olber’s Paradox, Herder and Herder, New York 1969.
Google Scholar

Jaki S.L., The Paradox of Olber’s Paradox. A Case History of Scientific Thoughts, Real View Books, Pinckney 2000.
Google Scholar

Kepler J., Conservation with the Starry Messenger, trans. E. Rosen, Johnson Reprint, New York 1965 [Dissertatio cum Nuncio Sidereo, 1610].
Google Scholar

Knutsen H., Darkness at night, European Journal of Physics 18(1997), 295–302.
Google Scholar

Kosinov N.V., Garbaruk V.I., Polyakov D.V., Photometric paradox and relic radiation – two sides of one phenomenon?, 2003, http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/photome.doc; (download: 30.09.2017).
Google Scholar

Krokos J., Odsłanianie intencjonalności, Liber Libri, Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

MacMillan W., Some postulates of cosmology, Scientia 31(1922), 105–113.
Google Scholar

MacMillan W., Some mathematical aspects of cosmology, Science (1925), 62, 63–72. 96–99. 121–127.
Google Scholar

Mädler J.H., Der Wunderbau des Weltalls, oder Populäre Astronomie, Carl Heymann, Berlin 1861.
Google Scholar

More G.S.M., Resolution of Olbers’ Paradox for Fractal Cosmological Models, Progress of Theoretical Physics 87(1992)2, 525–528.
Google Scholar

Olbers H., Über die Durchsichtigkeit des Weltraums, Astronomisches Jahrbuch für das Jahr 1826, C.F.E. Spaethen, Berlin 1826, 110–121.
Google Scholar

Overduin J.M., Wesson P.S., Dark Matter and Background Light, Physics Reports Journal (2004)402, 267–406.
Google Scholar

Poe E.A., Eureka: A Prose Poem, Geo. P. Putnam, New York 1848.
Google Scholar

Rainsford T., Newtonian and Post-Newtonian Cosmology, 2000, https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/19818/2/02whole.pdf; (download: 10.10.2018).
Google Scholar

Ramsey F., The Foundations of Mathematics, in: Foundations, ed. D.H. Mellor, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands 1978, 152–212.
Google Scholar

Rescher N., Paradoxes. Their Roots, Range, and Resolutions, Open Court, Chicago – La Salle 2001.
Google Scholar

Sanisbury R.M., Paradoxes (second edition), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995.
Google Scholar

Sorensen A.R., Brief History of the Paradox: philosophy and the labyrinths of the mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005.
Google Scholar

Stinner A., Why is the Sky Dark at Night? Teaching the Evolution of Our Models of the Cosmos, Interchange 452014)3–4, 123–131.
Google Scholar

The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Astronomy, ed. S. Mitton, Crown 1977.
Google Scholar

Thomson W., On Ether and Gravitational Matter through Infinite Space, Philosophical Magazine 6(1901)2, 161–177.
Google Scholar

Tipler F.J., Johann Mädler’s Resolution of Olbers’ Paradox, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 29(1988)3, 313–325.
Google Scholar

Verley J.C., More on Alternate Theories – No Plurals, APS News (2001)10, 4.
Google Scholar

Wesson P.S., Valle K., Strabell R., The Extragalactic Background Light and a Definite Resolution of Olbers’s Paradox, The Astrophysical Journal (1987)317, 601–606.
Google Scholar

Wesson P.S., The real reason the night sky is dark: Correcting a myth in astronomy teaching, Journal of the British Astronomical Association 99(1989)1, 10–13.
Google Scholar

Wesson P.S., Olbers’ Paradox and the Spectral Intensity of the Extragalactic Background Light, The Astrophysical Journal (1991)367, 399–406.
Google Scholar