Forma dekretu poszczególnego w kanonicznym porządku prawnym (kan. 51 KPK)

GINTER DZIERŻON

doi:10.21697/pk.2015.58.2.01

Published: 2017-06-16

Vol. 58 No. 2 (2015)

The form of a singular decree in the canonical legal order (Can. 51 CIC)

GINTER DZIERŻON

Prawo Kanoniczne

Section: Rozprawy i Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2015.58.2.01

Abstract

The author of the presented article carried out a thorough interpretation of can. 51 CIC. e focus of his attention were 2 issues: the question of a writ- ten form of a decree and the problem of motivation behind it. According to his analysis, the obligation to issue a decree in writing is not obvious.

The disposition included in can. 51 CICI does not accord with the criteria determined in can. 10 CIC which concerns invalidating and disqualifying laws. e author proved that the canonical legal order includes regulations concerning the written form of decrees which meet the conditions dened in can. 10 CIC. Such a legislative mechanism was used in can. 474 CIC according to which acts of the curia in order to have juridic eect must be signed by the ordinary. e author believes that the written form guaran- tees the validity and security of administrative acts and is necessary for evidential purposes.

Another focus of the author’s attention was the question of motivation of a decree. As he believes, from the perspective of administrative practice, the most appropriate solution would be for every issued act to include its motivation. In consequence, the addressee of an act would learn about both legal and actual reasons behind a particular decision.

The author proved that not meeting the requirement concerning the motivation of a decree does not result in its invalidity but makes it illegal since the norm included in can. 51 CIC does not meet the conditions codi- ed in can. 10 CIC.

Keywords:

singular decree, the form of a singular decree, canonical legal order

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

DZIERŻON, G. (2017). The form of a singular decree in the canonical legal order (Can. 51 CIC). Prawo Kanoniczne, 58(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2015.58.2.01

Cited by / Share

References

Źródła
Google Scholar

Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego. Przekład polski zatwierdzony przez Konferencję Episkopatu, Poznań 1984.
Google Scholar

PONTIFICIA COMMISIO CODICI IURIS CANONICI RECOGNOSCENDO, Coetus studiorum „De normis generalibus” (sessio II), Communicationes 17 (1985), s. 29 – 73.
Google Scholar

PONTIFICIA COMMISIO CODICI IURIS CANONICI RECOGNOSCENDO, Schema canonum de procedura administrativa, Typis Polyglotis Vaticanis 1972.
Google Scholar

Relatio complectens synthesim animadversionum ab Em.mis atque Exc.mis patribus commisionis ad novissimum Schema Codicis Iuris Canonici exhibatarum, cum responsionibus a Secretaria et consultoribus datis, Typis Polyglotis Vaticanis 1981.
Google Scholar

Literatura
Google Scholar

AMANN T., Der Verwaltungsakt für Einzelfälle, St. Ottilien 1997.
Google Scholar

AYMANS W., MÖRSDORF K., Kanonisches Recht, t. 1, Padeborn – München – Wien – Zürich 1991.
Google Scholar

BIER G., Volk Gottes: Innere Ordnung der Teilkirche, w: Münsterischer Kommentar zum Codex Iuris Canonici, red. K. LÜDICKE, t. 4, Essen 1985, ad 474.
Google Scholar

CHIAPPETTA L., Il Codice di Diritto Canonico. Commento giuridico – pastorale, Roma 1996.
Google Scholar

DE PAOLIS V., D’AURIA A., Le norme generali di Diritto Canonico. Commento al Codice di Diritto Canonico, Roma 2008.
Google Scholar

DZIERŻON G., Niezdolność do zawarcia małżeństwa jako kategoria kanoniczna, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar

JIMÉNEZ URRESTI T., Comento l. can. 51 CIC, w: Código de Derecho Canónico. Edición bilingüe comentada, red. L. DE ECHEVERIA, Madrd 1985, s. 51.
Google Scholar

KRUKOWSKI J., Komentarz do kan. 51 KPK, w: J. KRUKOWSKI, R. SOBAŃSKI, Komentarz do Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego, t. 1, Poznań 2003, s. 114 – 115.
Google Scholar

LABANDEIRA E., Trattato di diritto amministrativo canonico, Milano 1994.
Google Scholar

LOMBARDÍA P., Commento al can. 51 CIC, w: Codice di Diritto Canonico e le leggi complementari, red. J. ARRIETA, Roma 2007, s. 103.
Google Scholar

MIRAS J., CANOSA J., BAURA E., Compendio de derecho administrativo canónico, Pamplona 2001.
Google Scholar

MIRAS J., De actibus administrativis singularibus. Introducción, w: Comentario exegético al Código de Derecho Canónico, red. A. MARZOA, J. MIRAS, R. RODRÍGUEZ – OCAÑA, t. 1, Pamplona 1996, s. 498 – 499.
Google Scholar

PINTO P., De normis generalibus, w: Commento al Codice di Diritto Canonico, red. P. PINTO, Città del Vaticano 2001, s. 1 - 109.
Google Scholar

RAMOS F., Le dioecesi nel Codice di diritto canonico. Studio giuridico pastorale sulla organizzazione ed raggruppamenti delle Chiese particolari, Roma 1997.
Google Scholar

SOCHA H., Allgemeine Normen, w: Münsterischer Kommentar zum Codex Iuris Canonici, red. K. LÜDICKE, t. 1, Essen 1985, ad 51.
Google Scholar

Słowniki
Google Scholar

JOUGAN A., Słownik kościelny łacińsko – polski, Warszawa 1992.
Google Scholar

Mały słowniku języka polskiego, red. S. SKORUPSKI, H. AUDERSKA, Z. ŁEMPICKA, Warszawa 1969.
Google Scholar

Słownik języka polskiego PWN, red. L. DRABIK, A. KUBIAK – SOKÓŁ, E. SOBOL, L. WIŚNIEWSKA, wyd. III, Warszawa 1996.
Google Scholar

SONDEL J., Słownik języka łacińskiego dla prawników i historyków, Kraków 1997.
Google Scholar

GINTER DZIERŻON

wydawnictwo@uksw.edu.pl

Affiliation:

Canon Law Faculty of the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw Poland

Bio Statement (e.g., department and rank)

Fr. prof. dr hab. Ginter Dzierżon - full professor, head of the Department of Theory and General Norms of Canon Law at the Faculty of Canon Law of the UKSW. He is the author of over 200 scientific studies in the field of marriage law, general norms of canon law and legal theory.