Aydin, C. (2015). The artifactual mind: overcoming the ‘inside-outside’ dualism in the extended mind thesis and recognizing the technological dimension of cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 73-95.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9319-x
Google Scholar
Baker, L.R. (2009). Persons and the Extended Mind Thesis. Zygon, 44(3), 642-658.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01022.x
Google Scholar
Barandiaran, X.E., Di Paolo, E., i Rohde, M. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 367-386.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309343819
Google Scholar
Bayne, T. (2008). The Phenomenology of Agency. Philosophy Compass, 3(1), 182-202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00122.x
Google Scholar
Bayne, T., Levy, N. (2006). The Feeling of Doing: Deconstructing the Phenomenology of Agency. W N. Sebanz, W. Prinz (red.), Disorders of Volition (49-68). The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2457.003.0004
Google Scholar
Beer, R.D., Di Paolo, E.A. (2023). The theoretical foundations of enaction: Precariousness. Biosystems, 223, 104823.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104823
Google Scholar
Belk, R.W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
Google Scholar
Belk, R.W. (2013). Extended Self in the Digital World. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477-500.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/671052
Google Scholar
Bernini, M. (2014). Supersizing Narrative Theory: In Intention, Material Agency, and Extended Mind-Workers. Style, 48(3), 349-449.
Google Scholar
Bishop, J. (1997). Naturalising Mental Action. W G. Holmström-Hintikka, R. Tuomela (red.), Contemporary Action Theory, Volume 1: Individual Action (251-266). Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0439-7_14
Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (2019). Extended cognition and Extended Consciousness. W M. Colombo, E. Invine, M. Stapleton (red.), Andy Clark and His Critics (9-20). Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190662813.003.0002
Google Scholar
Chemero, A. (2001). Dynamical Explanation and Mental Representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(4), 141-142.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01627-2
Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. (1976), The Agent as Cause. W M. Brand, D. Walton (red.), Action Theory (199-211). D. Reidel Publishing Co.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9074-2_12
Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. (1995). Agents, Causes, and Events: The Problem of Free Will. W T. O’Connor (red.), Agents, Causes and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will (95-100). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
Google Scholar
Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00096
Google Scholar
Clowes, R. (2015). Thinking in the Cloud: The Cognitive Incorporation of Cloud-Based Technology. Philosophy and Technology, 28, 261-296.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0153-z
Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2002). Casual Relations. W D. Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (149-162). Clarendon Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246270.003.0007
Google Scholar
Formosa, P. (2021). Robot Autonomy vs. Human Autonomy: Social Robots, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and the Nature of Autonomy. Minds and Machines, 31, 595-616.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09579-2
Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2007). The Natural Philosophy of Agency. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 347-357.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00067.x
Google Scholar
Gallager, S., Zahavi, D. (2015). Fenomenologiczny umysł. PWN.
Google Scholar
Garrett, B. (1998). Personal Identity and Self-Consciousness. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. (2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
Google Scholar
Haselager, P. (2013). Did I Do That? Brain-Computer Interfacing and the Sense of Agency. Mind and Machines, 23(3), 405-418.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-012-9298-7
Google Scholar
Heersmink, R. (2012). Mind and Artifact: A Multidimensional Matrix for Exploring Cognition-Artifact Relations. W M. Bishop (red.), Proceedings of the 5th AISB Symposium on Computing and Philosophy (54-61). Yasemin Erden.
Google Scholar
Heersmink, R. (2017a). Distributed Cognition and Distributed Morality: Agency, Artifacts and Systems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(2), 431-448.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9802-1
Google Scholar
Heersmink, R. (2017b). Distributed selves: personal identity and extended memory systems. Synthese, 194, 3135-3151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1102-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1102-4
Google Scholar
Hilpinen, R. (1993). Authors and Artifacts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93, 158-178.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/93.1.155
Google Scholar
Hohwy, J. (2004). The Experience of Mental Causation. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 377-400.
Google Scholar
Horgan, T. (2007). Mental Causation and the Agent-Exclusion Problem. Erkenntnis, 67, 183-200.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-007-9067-9
Google Scholar
Horgan, T., Tienson, J., i Graham, G. (2003). The Phenomenology of First-Person Agency. W S. Walter, H.-D. Heckmann (red.), Physicalism and Mental Causation: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action (323-340). Imprint Academic.
Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (2001). Cognition, Distributed. W N. Smelser, P. Baltes (red.), The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2068-2072). Elsevier.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01636-3
Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (2011). Enculturating the supersized mind. Philosophical Studies, 152(3), 437-446.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9599-8
Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (2013). The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1), 34-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.830548
Google Scholar
Hutto, D., Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018548.001.0001
Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. (2006). Distributed cognition: A methodological note. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14(2), 249-262.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.2.06kir
Google Scholar
Leeuwen, van C., Verstijnen, I., i Hekkert, P. (1999). Common unconscious dynamics underlie uncommon conscious effects: a case study in the interaction of perception and creation. W J. Jordan (red.), Modeling Consciousness Across the Disciplines (179-218). University Press of America.
Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Malafouris, L. (2008). At the Potter’s Wheel: An Argument for Material Agency. W C. Knappet, L. Malafouris (red.), Material Agency. Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach (19-36). Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8_2
Google Scholar
Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175-183.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1
Google Scholar
Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Palgrave McMillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592889
Google Scholar
Meyers, D.T. (2005). Decentralizing autonomy: Five faces of selfhood. W J. Christman, J. Anderson (red.), Autonomy and the challenges to liberalism (27-55). Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610325.004
Google Scholar
Nakayama, J. (2013). The extended mind and the extended agent. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 503-510.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.265
Google Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, M. (2018). Freedom and the Phenomenology of Agency. Erkenntnis, 83(1), 61-87.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9872-0
Google Scholar
Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. W J.M. Carroll (red.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (17-38). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Nyholm, S. (2018). Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human-Robot Collaborations and Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1201-1219.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9943-x
Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. (2009). Agent-Causal Power. W T. Handfield (red.), Dispositions and Causes (184-214). Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199558933.003.0007
Google Scholar
Olson, E.T. (2011). The Extended Self. Mind and Machines, 21(4), 481-495.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9258-7
Google Scholar
Palermos, S.O., Pritchard, D. (2016). The Distribution of Epistemic Agency. W P.J. Reider, (red.), Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency: De-Centralizing Epistemic Agency (109-126). Rowman and Littlefield International.
Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1971). Personal Identity. Philosophical Review, 80, 3-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2184309
Google Scholar
Rhodes, B. (1997). The wearable remembrance agent: A system for augmented memory. Personal Technologies, 1, 218-224.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682024
Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes. Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583261
Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind. From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. A Bradford Book – The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014557.001.0001
Google Scholar
Sandberg, A., Bostrom, N. (2006). Converging cognitive enhancements. W W.S. Bainbridge, M.C. Roco (red.), Progress in convergence: Technologies for human wellbeing (201-227). Blackwell Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1382.015
Google Scholar
Schaefer, O., Kahane G., i Savulescu, J. (2014). Autonomy and Enhancement. Neuroethics, 7, 123-136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-013-9189-5
Google Scholar
Soltanzadeh, S. (2019). A Practically Useful Metaphysics of Technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 23(2), 232-250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2019924103
Google Scholar
Soltanzadeh, S. (2022). Strictly Human: Limitations of Autonomous Systems. Minds and Machines, 32, 269-288.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09582-7
Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2006). Distributed cognition: Domains and dimensions. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14(2), 235-247.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.2.05sut
Google Scholar
Swallow, J. (2013). Sharing the blame: Implications of the hypothesis of extended cognition for personal identity and ethics. (BA Philosophy Dissertation). University of Exeter.
Google Scholar
Szanto, T. (2014). How to share a mind: Reconsidering the group mind thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13, 99-120.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9323-1
Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1966). Action and Purpose. Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Theiner, G., Wilson, R. (2013). Group Mind. W B. Kaldis (red.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences (401-404). Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Tollefsen, D.P. (2015). Groups as Agents. Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Tomczyk, B. (2021). Knower at Risk: Updating Epistemology in the Light of Enhanced Representations. Studia Semiotyczne, 35(1), 35-54.
Google Scholar
Tomczyk, B. (2023). The Locus of Agency in Extended Cognitive Systems. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-023-09666-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-023-09666-1
Google Scholar
Tomczyk, B. (2024). I Act therefore I Live? Autopoiesis, Sensorimotor Autonomy and Extended Agency. Diametros. DOI 10.33392/diam.1847.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1847
Google Scholar
Trybulec, B. (2015). Grupa jako podmiot stanów intencjonalnych – indywidualizm a obiektywizm. Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa, 2, 147-156.
Google Scholar
Trybulec, B. (2017). Group as a distributed subject of knowledge. Between radicalism and triviality. Avant, 7, 183-207.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26913/80102017.0101.0012
Google Scholar
Trybulec, B. (2018). It takes efford to be (Collectively Rational): Group as a Reasoning Agent. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 111, 54-70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004359475_004
Google Scholar
Vanacker, G., Millan, del R., Lew, E., Ferrez, P.W., Moles, F.G., Philips, J., van Brussel H., i Nuttin, M. (2007). Contextbased filtering for assisted brain-actuated wheelchair driving. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/cin/2007/025130.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/25130
Google Scholar
Varela, F. (1979). Principles of Biological Autonomy. North Holland.
Google Scholar
Wachowski, W. (2022). Poznanie rozproszone. Od heurystyk do mechanizmów. Wydawnictwo UMCS.
Google Scholar
Wegner, D. (2002), The Illusion of Conscious Will. The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3650.001.0001
Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2010). In defense of extended functionalism. W R. Menary (red.), The Extended Mind (245-270). The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8535.003.0011
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.02
English
Język Polski