(Gesichts)züge, Notation and Graphicness of Signs. Deconstruction in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

Michał Piekarski

doi:10.21697/spch.2022.58.A.16

Opublikowane: 2022-12-31

Tom 58 Nr 2 (2022)

(Gesichts)züge, Notation and Graphicness of Signs. Deconstruction in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

Michał Piekarski

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

Dział: Artykuły naukowe

https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2022.58.A.16

Abstrakt

In this paper, I attempt to address some of the themes of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus logico-philosophicus with the aim of their deconstructionist interpretation. My analysis is based on David Gunkel’s book Deconstruction (MIT Press 2021). Based on some of its findings, I show how the Tractatus allows deconstruction and its practice to be thought. I show that the graphic structure of signs is crucial for the young Wittgenstein’s analysis and that it justifies the metaphysical findings in favor of which he argues.

-------------------------

Received:11/09/2022. Reviewed: 17/11/2022. Accepted: 1/12/2022.

Słowa kluczowe:

Ludwig Wittgenstein, deconstruction, logic, difference, writing, notation, sign

Inne teksty tego samego autora

Michał Piekarski, THE PROBLEM OF LOGICAL FORM: WITTGENSTEIN AND LEIBNIZ , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 56 Nr S1 (2020)
Michał Piekarski, Can action be normative? Some preliminary remarks , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 52 Nr 3 (2016)
Michał Piekarski, Two arguments supporting the thesis of the predictive nature of reasons for action , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 54 Nr 1 (2018)
Michał Piekarski, One or many normativities? , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 54 Nr 1 (2018)
Michał Piekarski, Problem formy logicznej: Wittgenstein a Leibniz , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 51 Nr 1 (2015)
Michał Piekarski, Jedna czy wiele normatywności? , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 54 Nr 2 (2018)
Michał Piekarski, Podstawy fenomenologii poznania a problem języka. Uwagi do książki Witolda Płotki "Studia z fenomenologii poznania" , Studia Philosophiae Christianae: Tom 55 Nr 4 (2019)

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Piekarski, M. (2022). (Gesichts)züge, Notation and Graphicness of Signs. Deconstruction in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 58(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2022.58.A.16

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Crary, A., Read, R. (eds.). (2000). The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (2003). How Do We Recognize Structuralism?. In: G. Deleuze, Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953–1974), 170-192. New York: Semiotext(e).
Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1979). Of Grammatology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1993). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (2005). Freud and the Scene of Writing. In: J. Derrida, Writing and Difference, 246-292. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (2011). Voice and Phenomenon. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1951). A note upon the “mystic writing-pad”. In: D. Rapaport (ed.), Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources, 329-337. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10584-016
Google Scholar

Gunkel, D.J. (2021). Deconstruction. Cambridge – London: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13637.001.0001
Google Scholar

Hanna, R. (2017). Wittgenstein and Kantianism. In: H.-J. Glock, J. Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein, 682-698. Hoboken: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884607.ch45
Google Scholar

Hintikka, M.B., Hintikka, J. (1986). Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague: Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4900-8
Google Scholar

Lacan, J. (2007). Ecrits. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Google Scholar

McGinn, M. (2006). Elucidating the ‘Tractatus’: Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244447.001.0001
Google Scholar

Rotter, K. (1996). Idea nauk formalnych we wczesnej filozofii Ludwiga Wittgensteina 1913-1922. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Google Scholar

Stevens, G. (2017). Wittgenstein and Russell. In: H.-J. Glock, J. Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein, 92-109. Hoboken: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884607.ch5
Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notes Dictated to G.E. Moore. In: G.H. von Wright, G.E.M. Anscombe (eds.), Notebooks 1914-1916. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. McGuinness. London – New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar