(Gesichts)züge, Notation and Graphicness of Signs. Deconstruction in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

Michał Piekarski

doi:10.21697/spch.2022.58.A.16

Data publikacji : 2022-12-31

Tom 58 Nr 2 (2022)

(Gesichts)züge, Notation and Graphicness of Signs. Deconstruction in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus

Michał Piekarski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-526X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2022.58.A.16

Abstrakt

In this paper, I attempt to address some of the themes of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus logico-philosophicus with the aim of their deconstructionist interpretation. My analysis is based on David Gunkel’s book Deconstruction (MIT Press 2021). Based on some of its findings, I show how the Tractatus allows deconstruction and its practice to be thought. I show that the graphic structure of signs is crucial for the young Wittgenstein’s analysis and that it justifies the metaphysical findings in favor of which he argues.

-------------------------

Received:11/09/2022. Reviewed: 17/11/2022. Accepted: 1/12/2022.

Słowa kluczowe:

Ludwig Wittgenstein, deconstruction, logic, difference, writing, notation, sign

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Piekarski, M. (2022). (Gesichts)züge, Notation and Graphicness of Signs. Deconstruction in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 58(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2022.58.A.16

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Crary, A., Read, R. (eds.). (2000). The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G. (2003). How Do We Recognize Structuralism?. In: G. Deleuze, Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953–1974), 170-192. New York: Semiotext(e).

Derrida, J. (1979). Of Grammatology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Derrida, J. (1993). Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Derrida, J. (2005). Freud and the Scene of Writing. In: J. Derrida, Writing and Difference, 246-292. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Derrida, J. (2011). Voice and Phenomenon. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Freud, S. (1951). A note upon the “mystic writing-pad”. In: D. Rapaport (ed.), Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources, 329-337. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10584-016

Gunkel, D.J. (2021). Deconstruction. Cambridge – London: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13637.001.0001

Hanna, R. (2017). Wittgenstein and Kantianism. In: H.-J. Glock, J. Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein, 682-698. Hoboken: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884607.ch45

Hintikka, M.B., Hintikka, J. (1986). Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.

Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague: Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4900-8

Lacan, J. (2007). Ecrits. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

McGinn, M. (2006). Elucidating the ‘Tractatus’: Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244447.001.0001

Rotter, K. (1996). Idea nauk formalnych we wczesnej filozofii Ludwiga Wittgensteina 1913-1922. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Stevens, G. (2017). Wittgenstein and Russell. In: H.-J. Glock, J. Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein, 92-109. Hoboken: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884607.ch5

Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notes Dictated to G.E. Moore. In: G.H. von Wright, G.E.M. Anscombe (eds.), Notebooks 1914-1916. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. McGuinness. London – New York: Routledge.