Alberts B., Johnson A., Lewis J., Morgan D., Raff M., Roberts K., Walter P., Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition), Garland Science – Taylor and Francis, New York 2015.
Google Scholar

Barrett J., Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(2000)1, 29-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9
Google Scholar

Barrett J., Why Would Anyone Believe in God?, AltaMira, Walnut Creek 2004.
Google Scholar

Bartholomew D., God, Chance and Purpose – Can God Have It Both Ways?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
Google Scholar

Behe M.J., Darwin’s Black Box – The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Free Press, New York 1996.
Google Scholar

Behe M.J., The Edge of Evolution – The Search for the Limits of Darwinism, Free Press, New York 2007.
Google Scholar

Boudry M., Blancke S., Braeckman J., Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design – A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience, The Quarterly Review of Biology 85(2010)4, 473-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/656904
Google Scholar

Chaban B., Coleman I., Beeby M., Evolution of Higher Torque in Campylobacter-type Bacterial Flagellar Motors, Scientific Reports 8(2018)1, article 97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18115-1
Google Scholar

Darwin C., On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, John Murray, London 1859, (http://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1859_Origin_F373.pdf), [accessed 09/2020]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68064
Google Scholar

Dawes G., What is Wrong with Intelligent Design?, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61(2007)2, 69-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9112-2
Google Scholar

Dawkins R., The Blind Watchmaker – Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (Illustrated Edition), W.W. Norton, New York 2015.
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., Intelligent Design – The Bridge Between Science and Theology, InterVarsity, Downers Grove 1999.
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., Irreducible Complexity Revisited, Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design (2004)3.1.4, 1-47.
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., No Free Lunch – Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence, Rowman and Littlefield, Plymouth 2002.
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., Reinstating Design within Science, in: Unapologetic Apologetics – Meeting the Challenges of Theological Studies, ed. W.A. Dembski, J.W. Richards, InterVarsity, Downers Grove 2001, 239-257.
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., Specification – The Pattern That Signifies Intelligence, Philosophia Christi 7(2005)2, 299-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pc20057230
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., The Design Inference – Eliminating Chance through Small Possibilities (Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction, and Decision Theory), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., The Design Revolution – Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design, InterVarsity, Downers Grove 2004.
Google Scholar

Dembski W.A., The Logical Underpinnings of Intelligent Design, in: Debating Design – From Darwin to DNA, ed. W.A. Dembski, M. Ruse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004, 311-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804823.018
Google Scholar

Derham W., Physico-theology, or a Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God from His Works of Creation, W. Innys and J. Richardson, London 1754.
Google Scholar

Fitelson B., Stephens C., Sober E, How Not to Detect Design – Critical Notice: William A. Dembski, ‘The Design Inference’, Philosophy of Science 66(1999)3, 472-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/392699
Google Scholar

Hume D., Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Penguin Books, London, 1779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00044084
Google Scholar

Kant I., The Critique of Pure Reason, trans. from German and eds. P. Guyer, A.W. Wood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988.
Google Scholar

Leech D., Visala A., The Cognitive Science of Religion – A Modified Theist Response, Religious Studies 47(2011)3, 301-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412510000302
Google Scholar

Leech D., Visala, A. The Cognitive Science of Religion – Implications for Theism?, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 46(2011)1, 47-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01157.x
Google Scholar

Loikkanen J., William A. Dembski’s Argument for Detecting Design through Specified Complexity, Philosophy and Theology 27(2015)2, 289-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol2015102631
Google Scholar

Loikkanen J., William A. Dembski’s Project of Intelligent Design, Studia Theologica – Nordic Journal of Theology 72(2018)1, 68-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2018.1430615
Google Scholar

McGrath A.E., Darwinism and the Divine – Evolutionary Thought and Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444392524
Google Scholar

Meyer S.C., Signature in the Cell – DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, Harper One, New York 2009.
Google Scholar

Mulder D.H., Objectivity, in: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, eds. J. Fieser, B. Dowden, 2004, (https://www.iep.utm.edu/objectiv/), [accessed 09/2020].
Google Scholar

Murray M.J., Natural Providence (Or Design Trouble), in: Philosophy of Religion – An Anthology (Sixth Edition), eds. L.P. Pojman, M.R. Rea, Wadsworth, Belmont 2012, 596-612.
Google Scholar

Paley W., Natural Theology, or Evidence of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature, eds. M.D. Eddy, D. Knight, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006.
Google Scholar

Pallen M.J., Matzke N.J., From the Origin of Species to the Origin of Bacterial Flagella, Nature Reviews Microbiology 4(2006)10, 784-790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1493
Google Scholar

Perakh M., Unintelligent Design, Prometheus, Amherst 2003.
Google Scholar

Ratzsch D., Nature, Design, and Science – The Status of Design in Natural Science, State University of New York Press, Albany 2011.
Google Scholar

Ray J., The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation, R. Harbin, London 1717.
Google Scholar

Sedley D., Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity (Sather Classical Lectures 66), University of California Press, Berkeley – Los Angeles 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520934368
Google Scholar

Sober E., Philosophy of Biology, Westview, Boulder 1993.
Google Scholar

The Center for Science and Culture, What Is the Science Behind Intelligent Design?, 2009, (http://www.discovery.org/a/9761), [accessed 09/2020].
Google Scholar

Van Till H.J. ‘Intelligent Design’ Theory, Two Viewpoints – Does ‘Intelligent Design’ Have a Chance?, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 34(1999)4, 667-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00244
Google Scholar

Visala A., Naturalism, Theism and the Cognitive Study of Religion – Religion Explained? (Ashgate Science and Religion Series), Ashgate, Farnham 2011.
Google Scholar

Wallace A.R., On the Tendency of Varieties to Depart Indefinitely From the Original Type, in: Alfred Russel Wallace Classic Writings, Paper 1, ed. C.H. Smith, Western Kentucky University 2009, (https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=dlps_fac_arw), [accessed 09/2020].
Google Scholar

Williams D., Friday Five: William A. Dembski, CitizenLink, December 14 2007, (http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000006139.cfm), [accessed 09/2020].
Google Scholar

Wong T., Amidi A., Dodds A., Siddiqi S., Wang J., Yep T., Tamang D.G., Saier Jr. M.H., Evolution of the Bacterial Flagellum, Microbe 2(2007)7, 335-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.2.335.1
Google Scholar

Young M., Edis T. (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails – A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick 2004.
Google Scholar