Tutoring w nauczaniu historii sztuki – skuteczne techniki i strategie indywidualizacji na przykładzie nauczania historii sztuki średniowiecznej

Aleksandra Krauze-Kołodziej

doi:10.21697/an.14423

Opublikowane: 2024-12-20

Nr 8 (2024)

Tutoring in Teaching Art History – Effective Techniques and Strategies of Individualization on the Example of Teaching Medieval Art History

Aleksandra Krauze-Kołodziej

Artifex Novus

Dział: Artykuły tematyczne

https://doi.org/10.21697/an.14423

Abstrakt

The article analyzes the effectiveness of selected elements of tutoring understood as various individualization strategies in teaching medieval art history. The basis of the article is a study involving an experimental component carried out as part of the Masters of Didactics (MoD) project organized by the Ministry of Education and Science (2017–2022). The teaching innovation consisted of introducing tutoring strategies into the curriculum of 2 subjects, including individualized exercises, creative and interactive approaches to learning, elective topics, and project scopes, clearly defined task criteria, individually given feedback, and personalized consultations. Before and after courses, a diagnostic and evaluation survey was conducted to assess students’ knowledge, expectations, and final opinions. Students’ opinions showed significant benefits, including increased understanding of the subject and gains in practical skills and soft skills. The article highlights the value of individualized teaching and learning in art history and its potential applications in other disciplines, contributing to the implementation of effective teaching strategies and increased student learning outcomes.

Słowa kluczowe:

historia sztuki średniowiecznej, tutoring, zindywidualizowane nauczanie i uczenie się, informacja zwrotna, kreatywne narzędzia

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Krauze-Kołodziej, A. (2024). Tutoring in Teaching Art History – Effective Techniques and Strategies of Individualization on the Example of Teaching Medieval Art History. Artifex Novus, (8), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.21697/an.14423

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Bałus Wojciech, A Marginalised Tradition? Polish Art History, in: Art History and Visual Studies in Europe. Transnational Discourses and National Frameworks, ed. Matthew Rampley et al., Leiden–Boston 2012, pp. 439–449.
Google Scholar

Bochnak Adam, Zarys dziejów Polskiej historii sztuki, Kraków 1948.
Google Scholar

Brown Peter Scott, Hargis Jace, Undergraduate Research in Art History Using Project Based Learning, „The Journal of Faculty Development”, vol. 22, 2008, no. 2, pp. 152–158.
Google Scholar

Donahue-Wallace Kelly, A Tale of Two Courses: Instructor-Driven and Student-Centered Approaches to Online Art History Instruction, in: Teaching Art History with New Technologies: Reflections and Case Studies, ed. Kelly Donahue-Wallace, Laetitia La Follette, Andrea Pappas, Newcastle 2008, pp. 109–118.
Google Scholar

Donahue-Wallace Kelly, Chanda Jacqueline, A Case Study in Integrating the Best Practices of Face-to-Face Art History and Online Teaching, „Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning”, vol. 7, 2005, no. 1, pp. 97–102.
Google Scholar

Ehly Stewart, Keith Timothy Z., Bratton Barry, The Benefits of Tutoring: An Exploration of Expectancy and Outcomes, „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, vol. 12, 1987, no. 2, pp. 131–134.
Google Scholar

Evans Carol, Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education, „Review of Educational Research”, vol. 83, 2013, no. 1, pp. 70–120.
Google Scholar

Fernandes Sandra, Flores Maria Assunção, Tutors’ and Students’ Views of Tutoring, in: Back to the Future: Legacies, Continuities and Changes in Educational Policy, Practice and Research, ed. Maria Assunção Flores, Ana Amélia Carvalho, Fernando Ilídio Ferreira, Maria Teresa Vilaça, Rotterdam 2013, pp. 277–295.
Google Scholar

Fortes Pauline, Tchantchane Abdellatif, Dealing with Large Classes: A Real Challenge, „Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences”, vol. 8, 2010, pp. 272–280.
Google Scholar

Gasper-Hulvat Marie, Active Learning in Art History: A Review of Formal Literature, „Art History Pedagogy & Practice”, vol. 2, 2017, no. 1: Continuing the Conversation, pp. 1–32.
Google Scholar

Guo Pengyue, Saab Nadira, Post Lysanne S., Admiraal Wilfried, A Review of Project-Based Learning in Higher Education: Student Outcomes and Measures, „International Journal of Educational Research”, vol. 102, 2020, p. 101586.
Google Scholar

Henderson Michael, Tracii Ryan, Phillips Michael, The Challenges of Feedback in Higher Education, „Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education”, vol. 44, 2019, no. 8, pp. 1237–1252.
Google Scholar

Jenkins Alan (ed.), Teaching Large Classes in Higher Education: How to Maintain Quality with Reduced Resources, London 2014.
Google Scholar

Karpińska-Musiał Beata, Edukacja spersonalizowana w uniwersytecie: ideologia – instytucja – dydaktyka – tutor, Kraków 2016.
Google Scholar

Karpińska-Musiał Beata, Tutoring akademicki jako rekonstrukcja relacji Uczeń – Mistrz wobec umasowienia kształcenia wyższego. Próba wplecenia koncepcji w kontekst wewnętrznego systemu zapewniania jakości kształcenia jako jednego z kryteriów akredytacji uczelni wyższych, „Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe”, vol. 2, 2012, no. 40, pp. 55–70.
Google Scholar

Kokotsaki Dimitra, Menzies Victoria, Wiggins Andy, Project-Based Learning: A Review of the Literature, „Improving Schools”, vol. 19, 2016, no. 3, pp. 267–277.
Google Scholar

La Follette Laetitia, Blending New Learning Technologies into the Traditional Art History Lecture Course, in: Teaching Art History with New Technologies: Reflections and Case Studies, ed. Kelly Donahue-Wallace, Laetitia La Follette, Andrea Pappas, Newcastle 2008, pp. 44–56.
Google Scholar

Lameński Lechosław, O nauczaniu historii sztuki na Katolickim Uniwersytecie Lubelskim słów kilka, „Roczniki Humanistyczne”, vol. 58, 2010, no. 4, pp. 7–11.
Google Scholar

Lewińska Beata, Dydaktyka historii sztuki na UKSW – Refleksje praktyka dotyczące metodyki kształcenia, „Artifex Novus”, 2018, no. 2, pp. 124–135.
Google Scholar

Machowska-Okrój Sylwia, Tutoring jako metoda rozwoju studenta w kontekście obowiązującego paradygmatu oraz jako element doskonalenia jakości kształcenia, „Teoria i Praktyka Dydaktyki Akademickiej”, vol. 2, 2023, no. 1, pp. 1–20.
Google Scholar

Makhambetova Aliya, Nadezhda Zhiyenbayeva, and Elena Ergesheva, Personalized Learning Strategy as a Tool to Improve Academic Performance and Motivation of Students, „International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies”, vol. 16, 2021, pp. 1–17.
Google Scholar

Małkiewicz Adam, Z dziejów polskiej historii sztuki. Studia i szkice, Kraków 2005.
Google Scholar

Martikainen Jari, Making Pictures as a Method of Teaching Art History, „International Journal of Education & the Arts”, vol. 18, 2017, no. 19, pp. 1–25.
Google Scholar

McConlogue Teresa, Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: A Guide for Teachers, London 2020.
Google Scholar

Muthesius Stefan, The Cracow school of modern art history: the creation of a method and an institution 1850–1880, „The Journal of Art Historiography”, vol. 8, 2013, pp. 1–33.
Google Scholar

Phillips Niki, Fragoulis Iosif, The Use of Art in the Teaching Practice for Developing Communication Skills in Adults, „International Education Studies”, vol. 5, 2012, no. 2, pp. 132–138.
Google Scholar

Prochazka Jakub, Ovcari Martin, Durinik Michal, Sandwich Feedback, The Empirical Evidence of Its Effectiveness, „Learning and Motivation”, vol. 71, 2020, p. 101649.
Google Scholar

Ratajczak Sabina, Tutoring akademicki – korzyści dla studenta, nauczyciela i uczelni wyższej, „Kultura i Edukacja”, vol. 113, 2016, no. 3, pp. 154–171.
Google Scholar

Rust Chris, Price Magaret, O’Donovan Berry, Improving Students’ Learning by Developing Their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes, „Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education”, vol. 28, 2003, no. 2, pp. 147–164.
Google Scholar

Sadler Royce D., Interpretations of Criteria‐based Assessment and Grading in Higher Education, „Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education”, vol. 30, 2005, no. 2, pp. 175–194.
Google Scholar

Sippel Lieselotte, Maximizing the Benefits of Peer Interaction: Form-Focused Instruction and Peer Feedback Training, „Language Teaching Research”, vol. 28, 2024, no. 2, pp. 413–439.
Google Scholar

Ter-Stepanian Anahit, Discussion Board Assignments and Their Impact on Creating Engaged Learning Environments in Art History Online Courses, in: Handbook of Research on Didactic Strategies and Technologies for Education: Incorporating Advancements, ed. Paolo M. Pumilia-Gnarini et al., vol. 2, Hershey 2013, pp. 681–689.
Google Scholar

Tetzlaff Leonard, Florian Schmiedek, Garvin Brod, Developing Personalized Education: A Dynamic Framework, „Educational Psychology Review”, vol. 33, 2021, no. 3, pp. 863–882.
Google Scholar

Veratelli Federica, Habcy Jasmine, Didattica della storia dell’arte, Milano 2020.
Google Scholar

Brdulak Jakub, Gotlib Joanna, Koziołek Ryszard, Uriasz Janusz (eds.), Projekt: „Mistrzowie dydaktyki” Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. Model tutoringu, 2019, https://www.gov.pl/attachment/8fd3a897-d990-4034-b216-b0f669d1e102 [access: 10 XI 2023].
Google Scholar

Brdulak Jakub, Glińska-Lewczuk Katarzyna, Janus-Sitarz Anna, Uriasz Janusz (eds.). Project: Masters of Didactics. A Masters Of Didactics Model for University Teaching and Tutoring. Final version, 2022, https://www.gov.pl/web/edukacja-i-nauka/ostateczny-model-stosowania-tutoringu [access: 10 XI 2023].
Google Scholar

https://www.kul.pl/centrum-dydaktyki-akademickiej,111034.html [access 10 XI 2023].
Google Scholar