Finding Solutions to Ecological and Environmental Crisis with a New Ethics

Eva Pechočiaková Svitačová

doi:10.21697/seb.2024.05

Published: 2024-02-07

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024)

Finding Solutions to Ecological and Environmental Crisis with a New Ethics

Eva Pechočiaková Svitačová

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2024.05

Abstract

Ecological and environmental crises are related to the development of an anthropocentric human culture. They threaten the values on which human life and development on Earth depend, and therefore the need for a new ethic arises. The aim of this paper, which is based on a qualitative analysis of theoretical sources, is to highlight the gravity of these crises and to present a 'new ethics', which is referred to as the ethics of the future, the ethics of responsibility for the future or the ethics of sustainability. We draw on the work of H. Jonas and other thinkers who point out that the traditional ethics, which is also referred to as anthropocentric, is no longer sufficient in today's world. It cannot contribute to solving these crises. We argue in favour of a 'new ethics' that takes into account the distant future and relies on a new dimension of responsibility, but also of justice. It urges people to be able to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions and not to endanger the survival of humanity on the planet and also of all life. With this in mind, it should also play a part in shaping their moral character.

Keywords:

new ethics, anthropocentric ethics, ecological crisis, environmental crisis, new dimension of responsibility, environmental ethics, environmental philosophy, ecophilosophy, environmental responsibility, ecological ethics

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Pechočiaková Svitačová, E. (2024). Finding Solutions to Ecological and Environmental Crisis with a New Ethics. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 22(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2024.05

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Binka, Bohuslav. 2008. Environmentální etika [Environmental ethics]. Brno: MU.
Google Scholar

Capra, Fritjof. 1997a. “Ekogramotnost. Vzdělání pro příští století [Ecoliteracy. Education for the next century].” BARAKA Časopis pro nový věk, 3, Lecture from the conference Forum 2000. Accessed December 02, 2020. https://www.baraka.cz/Baraka/Baraka_3.pdf.
Google Scholar

Capra, Fritjof. 1997b. The web of life: a new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar

Capra, Fritjof. 2002. Bod obratu. Věda, společnost a nová kultura [Turning point. Science, Society and the New Culture]. Praha: Dharma Gaia.
Google Scholar

Diatka, Cyril. 2004. “Etické súvislosti ochrany životného prostredia [The ethical aspects of environmental protection].” In Filozofia a život – Život filozofie. Proceedings of the scientific 146th conference with international participation, edited by Eugen Andreánsky, 68-75. Prešov: Slovenské filozofické združenie pri SAV. Accessed February 02, 2023. http://www.sfz.sk/zborniky/2004_Filozofia_a_zivot-zivot_filozofie.pdf.
Google Scholar

Dubnička, Ivan. 2001. “Sever znova proti Juhu [North against South again].” Slovo. Accessed May 02, 2018. http://www.noveslovo.sk/node/41181.
Google Scholar

Gluchman, Vasil. 1998. “Etická teória a morálka súčasnosti [Ethical theory and contemporary morality].” In Kríza filozofie a metafyziky – Zrkadlo filozofie krízy, edited by František Mihina, 196-209. Prešov: FF PU.
Google Scholar

Goralnik, Lissy, and Michael Paul Nelson. 2012. “Anthropocentrism.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, volume 1, edited by Ruth Chadwick, 145-155. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00349-5
Google Scholar

Hála, Vlastimil. 2013. Morální odpovědnost a její aspekty [Moral responsibility and its aspects]. Praha: FILOSOFIA.
Google Scholar

Hála, Vlastimil. 2016. “Obrana ‘antropocentrismu’ [Defence of ‘anthropocentrism’].” Environmentalismus 10(1): 63-73. https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2013-1-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2013-1-63
Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2009. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-3394-3
Google Scholar

Huba, Mikuláš. 2006. “Hodnoty, globálne problémy a hľadanie udržateľnejšej budúcnosti [Values, global challenges and the search for a more sustainable future].” Životné Prostredie 40(6): 285-287.
Google Scholar

Hutchings, Kimberly. 2010. Global Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans. 1997. Princip odpovědnosti. Pokus o etiku pro technologickou civilizaci [The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age]. Praha: Oikoymenh.
Google Scholar

Keller, Jan. 2011. “Koncept postindustriální společnosti a jeho slabiny [The concept of post-industrial society and its weaknesses].” Sociológia 43(4): 323-337.
Google Scholar

Kibert, Charles J., Leslie Thiele, Anna Peterson, and Martha Monroe. 2012. The Ethics of Sustainability. Accessed January 20, 2019. http://rio20.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Ethics-of-Sustainability-Textbook.pdf.
Google Scholar

Kohák, Erazim. 1996. “Filosofická ekológie po dvaceti letech [Philosophical ecology after twenty years].” In Závod s časem, edited by Albert Schweitzer et al., 7-20. Praha: MŽP.
Google Scholar

Kohák, Erazim. 2011. Zelená svatozář [Green Halo]. Praha: SLON.
Google Scholar

Kolářský, Rudolf. 2011. Filosofický význam současné ekologické krize [The philosophical meaning of the current ecological crisis]. Praha: Filosofia.
Google Scholar

Kumar, Satish. 1992. “Jsme opilí hmotným blahobytem. Rozhovor časopisu Poslední generace so Satishom Kumarom [We are drunk on material prosperity. The Last Generation magazine interview with Satish Kumar].” Poslední generace 5.
Google Scholar

Küng, Hans. 1992. Světový étos. Projekt [World ethos. Project]. Zlín: Archa.
Google Scholar

Küng, Hans. 2000. Světový étos pro politiku a hospodářství [World ethos for politics and economics]. Praha: Vyšehrad.
Google Scholar

Kusin, Vasil. 2014. “Ľudská kreativita a ekologické limity [Human creativity and ecological limits].” Revue spoločenských a humanitných vied 2(3-4): 1-9.
Google Scholar

Leonhard, Gerd. 2016. Technológia vs. Humanita [Technology vs. Humanity]. London: Fast Future Publishing Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800655342
Google Scholar

Leopold, Aldo. 1991. “Etika Země [The Land Ethic].” Filosofický časopis 6: 1011-1026.
Google Scholar

Leopold, Aldo. 1999. “Etika Země [The Land Ethic].” In Leopold, Aldo. Obrázky z chatrče a rozmanité poznámky, 233-255. Tulčík: Abies.
Google Scholar

Lipovetsky, Gilles. 2011. Soumrak povinnosti. Bezbolestná etika nových demokratických časů [The twilight of duty. The painless ethics of new democratic times]. Praha: PROSTOR.
Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad. 2014. Osm smrtelných hříchů civilizace [The Eight Deadly Sins of Civilized Man]. Praha: LEDA.
Google Scholar

Lovelock, James. 2014. A Rough Ride to the Future. New York: The Overlook Press.
Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Google Scholar

Minteer, Ben, and Robert Manning. 2005. “An Appraisal of the Critique of Anthropocentrism and Three Lesser Known Themes in Lynn White’s ‘The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis’.” Organization & Environment 18(2): 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026605276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026605276196
Google Scholar

Monnier, Claire. 2012. “Crise écologique et education. Vers une nouvelle position éthique dans le lien entre l'homme et la nature [Ecological crisis and education. Towards a new ethical position in the relationship between man and nature].” Revue d'éthique et de théologie morale 3(270): 97-112. https://doi.org/10.3917/retm.270.0097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/retm.270.0097
Google Scholar

Mravcová, Anna. 2019. “Environmental awareness and environmental citizenship dimension.” Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 19(2): 32-48. https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.190202
Google Scholar

Mravcová, Anna. 2020. “Environmentálne občianstvo v kontexte súčasného vývoja a bezprostredného ohrozenia [Environmental Citizenship in the Context of Current Development and Immediate Threat].” Filozofia 75(10): 845-860. https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.10.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.75.10.3
Google Scholar

Naess, Arne. 1973. “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement A Summary.” Inquiry 16: 95-100. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/naess-arne-the-shallow-and-the-deep-long-range-ecology-movement.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
Google Scholar

Naess, Arne. 1996. Ekologie, pospolitost a životní styl [Ecology, community and lifestyle]. Praha: ABIES.
Google Scholar

Nash, Roderick. 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics (History of American Thought and Culture). Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Google Scholar

Norton, Bryan. 1984. “Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism.” Environmental Ethics 6(2): 131-148. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19846233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19846233
Google Scholar

Oxford Reference. 2023. “Environmental crisis.” In A Dictionary of Environment and Conservation. Accessed July 10, 2023. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095753543;jsessionid=A409536402EE212E96EFC2B166E4C57F.
Google Scholar

Passmore, John. 1975. “Attitudes to nature.” In Nature and Conduct, edited by Richard Stanley Peters, 251-264. London: Palgrave, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02568-8_13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100001260
Google Scholar

Rak, Roman, Dagmar Kopencová, Vladimír Šulc, Vladimíra Hudecová, Peter Chriašteľ. 2021. “The Phenomenon of Crisis, Its Dimensions and Characteristics not only for Economists.” International Scientific Conference Economic and social policy 415-426. Accessed June 02, 2023. https://www.narodacek.cz/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/66665v_Proceedings-of-the-International-Scientific__-Conference_202180-3-428-439.pdf.
Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 1994. “Le concept de responsabilité: Essai d’analyse sémantique.” Esprit 206(11): 28-48.
Google Scholar

Routley, Richard, Val Routley. 1979. “Against the Inevitability of Human Chauvinism.” In Ethics and Problems of the 21. Century, edited by Kenneth E. Goodpaster, and Kenneth N. Sayre, 35-59. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Accessed May 31, 2023. https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/routley-richard-and-val-against-the-inevitability-of-human-chauvinism.pdf.
Google Scholar

Sadowski, Ryszard. 2023. “Roots of (and Solutions to) our Ecological Crisis. A Humanistic Perspective.” Ecological Civilization 1(1): 10001. https://doi.org/10.35534/ecolciviliz.2023.10001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/ecolciviliz.2023.10001
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. 2006. Jeden svet: Etika globalizácie [One World: The Ethics of Globalisation]. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Spolku slovenských spisovateľov.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. 2009. Spisy o etickom žití [Writings on Ethical Living]. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Spolku slovenských spisovateľov.
Google Scholar

Skolimowski, Henryk. 1996. “Ekologická etika a posvátnost života [Ecological ethics and the sanctity of life].” In Závod s časem. Texty z morální ekologie, edited by Erazim Kohák, Rudolf Kolářský, and Igot Míchal, 135-152. Praha: Torst.
Google Scholar

Slov-Lex Právny a informačný portál. 1992. Zákon č. 17/1992 Zb. Zákon o životnom prostredí [Act No 17/1992 Coll. Act on the Environment]. Accessed July 6, 2023. https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/1992/17/19920116.html.
Google Scholar

Šmajs, Jozef. 2013. “Proč etika nestačí. K ontologickému základu a revitalizácií morálky [Why ethics is not enough. On the ontological basis and revitalization of morality].” Filosofický časopis 61(6): 803-826.
Google Scholar

Smith-Sebasto, Nicholas J. 1997. “Education for ecological literacy.” In Environmental Education for the 21st century: International and interdisciplinary perspectives, edited by Patricia Thompson, 279-288. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Google Scholar

Smreková, Dagmar. 2013. “Pri prameňoch moderného pojmu zodpovednosti: idea imputácie [On the sources of the modern concept of responsibility: the idea of imputation].” In Morální odpovědnost a její aspekty, edited by Vlastimil Hála, 29-60. Praha: FILOSOFIA.
Google Scholar

Špirko, Dušan. 1999. Základy environmentálnej filozofie [Basis of environmental philosophy]. Bratislava: STU.
Google Scholar

Sťahel, Richard. 2019. Pojem krízy v environmentálnom myslení [The concept of crisis in environmental thinking]. Bratislava: Iris.
Google Scholar

Unesco-UNEP. 1985. Interdisciplinary Approaches in Environmental Education. Environmental Education Series 14. Unesco: Division of Science, Technical and Environmental Education. Accessed July 16, 2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000063334.
Google Scholar

Vavroušek, Jozef. 1994. “Hledání lidských hodnot slučitelných s trvale udržitelným způsobem života [The search for human values compatible with a sustainable way of life].” Teologické texty 5(46): 7-10.
Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. 2002. Hrubý a tenký o tolerancii [Thick and thin on tolerance]. Bratislava: Kalligram.
Google Scholar

WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1995. Our Creative Diversity. Johannesburg: EGOPRIM.
Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1990. Politika ako povolanie [Policy as a Vocation]. Bratislava: SPEKTRUM.
Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1998. Metodologie, sociologie a politika [Methodology, Sociology and Politics]. Praha. Oikoymenh.
Google Scholar

White, Lynn. 2000. “Historické kořeny naší ekologické krize [The historical roots of our ecologic crisis].” Filosofický časopis 48(5): 765-775.
Google Scholar

WWF. 2022. Reducing Norway’s footprint. Bringing our production and consumption within planetary boundaries. Oslo, Norway. Accessed May 31, 2023. https://media.wwf.no/assets/attachments/WWF-Reducing-Norways-Footprint.pdf
Google Scholar

Znoj, Milan, Milan Sobotka, and Ladislav Major. 1991. “Vztah člověka a přírody v podání novověké filosofie [The Relationship of Man and Nature in Modern Philosophy].” Filosofický časopis 39(6): 975-991.
Google Scholar