Faith, Climate, and Energy Frugality: Unravelling the Nexus in European Perspectives

Pablo García-García

doi:10.21697/seb.5812

Published: 2024-08-06

Vol. 22 No. 3 (2024)

Faith, Climate, and Energy Frugality: Unravelling the Nexus in European Perspectives

Pablo García-García

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5812

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between religious beliefs, perceptions of climate change, and preferences for energy frugality in Europe using data from the November 2023 European Social Survey across 22 countries. The research reveals a predominant inclination toward median values in addressing climate change, with subtle variations based on levels of religiosity. Lower religiosity tends to be associated with a nuanced attribution of climate change to human activity. There is a complex interplay between religiosity and the perception of personal responsibility in mitigating climate change, indicating some polarisation but an overall increasing sense of accountability. Religious affiliations show distinct attitudes, with Protestants more inclined to attribute climate change to human causes. Roman Catholics are closer to some Protestants, while other Christian denominations exhibit flexibility and common ground with Islam and Judaism. However, it is concluded that demographics and political alignment play a more pivotal role compared to religiosity levels or religious denominations.

Keywords:

religion and ecology, environmental consciousness, energy policy, perception analysis, Christianity and ecology

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

García-García, P. (2024). Faith, Climate, and Energy Frugality: Unravelling the Nexus in European Perspectives. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 22(3), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5812

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Agustinus. 1845. “Enarratio in Psalmum 45.” In Patrologia Latina. Vol. 518. Paris: MIGNE J.-P.
Google Scholar

Balcomb, Anthony Oswald. 2019. “African Christianity and The Ecological Crisis – Tracing the Contours of a Conundrum.” Scriptura 118 (1). https://doi.org/10.7833/118-1-1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7833/118-1-1469
Google Scholar

Bratton, Susan. 2018. “Eco-Dimensionality as a Religious Foundation for Sustainability.” Sustainability 10 (4): 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041021
Google Scholar

Briguglio, Marie, Teresa Garcia-Muñoz, and Shoshana Neuman. 2020. “Environmental Engagement, Religion and Spirituality in the Context of Secularization.” Environmental Research Letters 15 (10): 104098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb6a0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb6a0
Google Scholar

Brown, Colin. 1990. Christianity and Western Thought: A History of Philosophers, Ideas & Movements. Westmont: InterVarsity Press.
Google Scholar

Brown, R. Khari, Angela Kaiser, and Hannah Evans. 2023. “Race, Religious Identities, and Environmental Activism.” Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community 51 (1): 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2021.1924596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2021.1924596
Google Scholar

Cope, Michael R., Kayci A. Muirbrook, Paige N. Park, Scott R. Sanders, Carol Ward, and Rachel M. Sumsion. 2023. “Understanding Environmentalism: The Interplay between Politics and Religion on Environmental Attitudes from Rural Utah.” Society & Natural Resources, January, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2169423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2169423
Google Scholar

ESS Round 10: European Social Survey Round 10 Data. 2020. “Data File Edition 3.0. Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, Norway – Data Archive and Distributor of ESS Data for ESS ERIC.” 2020.
Google Scholar

ESS Round 10: European Social Survey Round 10 Data. 2023. “ESS10 - Integrated File, Edition 3.2.” November 2023.
Google Scholar

Ferrara. 2019. “Sustainable International Relations. Pope Francis’ Encyclical Laudato Si’ and the Planetary Implications of ‘Integral Ecology.’” Religions 10 (8): 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10080466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10080466
Google Scholar

Gozum, Ivan Efreaim A., Abelardo E. Garcia, and John Lu Allan M. Nucum. 2022. “Laudato Si’ and the Role of the Church in Promoting Environmental Awareness Toward a Better Health-Related Quality of Life.” Journal of Religion and Health, August. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01631-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01631-4
Google Scholar

Hughes, Donald J. 1975. Ecology in Ancient Civilizations. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Google Scholar

IFEES/EcoIslam. 2024. “Islamic Foundation for Ecology and Environmental Sciences: Protecting our Planet for Future Generations.” Accessed March 11, 2024. https://www.ifees.org.uk.
Google Scholar

International Statistical Institute. 2010. “ISI Declaration on Professional Ethics.” 2010. https://www.isi-web.org/about/policies/professional-ethics/isi-declaration.
Google Scholar

Kollar, Nathan R. 2019. “Religions’ Future in the Anthropocene.” Worldviews 23 (1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-02301001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-02301001
Google Scholar

Krosnick, Jon A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5 (3): 213–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305
Google Scholar

LSM. 2024. “Laudato Si' Movement: Catholics for Our Common Home.” Accessed March 11, 2024. https://laudatosimovement.org.
Google Scholar

MacCulloch, Diarmaid. 2009. Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years. New York: Penguin Random House.
Google Scholar

Mayer, Claude-Hélène, Wolfgang M. George, and Elmar Nass. 2020. “‘Care for the Common Home’: Responses to Pope Francis’s Encyclical Letter.” Journal of Religion and Health 59 (1): 416–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00957-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00957-w
Google Scholar

McHarge, Ian. 2006. The Essential Ian McHarg: Writings on Design and Nature. Washington DC: Island Press.
Google Scholar

Michaels, Jay L., Feng Hao, Julia Smirnov, and Ishan Kulkarni. 2021. “Beyond Stewardship and Dominion? Towards a Social Psychological Explanation of the Relationship between Religious Attitudes and Environmental Concern.” Environmental Politics 30 (4): 622–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1787777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1787777
Google Scholar

Monsalve Girón, José Alfredo. 2019. “La Aportación de Las Creencias Religiosas a La Construcción de Una Ética Ambiental.” Observatorio Medioambiental 22 (December): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.5209/obmd.67063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/obmd.67063
Google Scholar

Nicholson, Max. 1989. The New Environmental Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Öhlmann, Philipp, and Ignatius Swart. 2022. “Religion and Environment.” Religion and Theology 29 (3–4): 292–321. https://doi.org/10.1163/15743012-bja10044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15743012-bja10044
Google Scholar

Palmer, G. E. H., P. Sherrard, K. Ware, Nikodimos, and Makarios. 2010. The Philokalia. London: Faber and Faber.
Google Scholar

Pedersen, Olaf. 1992. “Księga Natury.” In Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce, 14:19–50.
Google Scholar

Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina, Adrian Ana, Iris Vermeir, and Dacinia Crina Petrescu. 2020. “Beliefs and Actions Towards an Environmental Ethical Life: The Christianity-Environment Nexus Reflected in a Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33 (3–6): 421–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-020-09832-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-020-09832-1
Google Scholar

Pihkala, Panu. 2018. “Eco-Anxiety, Tragedy, And Hope: Psychological and Spiritual Dimensions of Climate Change.” Zygon® 53 (2): 545–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12407
Google Scholar

Puglisi, Antonino, and Johan Buitendag. 2022. “A Faith-Based Environmental Approach for People and the Planet: Some Inter-Religious Perspectives on Our Earth-Embeddedness.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 78 (2). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i2.7582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i2.7582
Google Scholar

Rappaport, Margaret Boone, and Christopher J. Corbally. 2023. “An Ecotheology for Human Settlement of the Outer Planets: Roles for Religion Beyond the Warmth of the Sun.” Theology and Science 21 (2): 209–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2188368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2188368
Google Scholar

Rifat, Mohammad Rashidujjaman, Toha Toriq, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2020. “Religion and Sustainability.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4 (CSCW2): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3415199
Google Scholar

Sadowski, Ryszard F. 2020. “On Religious and Cultural Principles of Environmental Protection.” Problemy Ekorozwoju 15 (2): 75–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.2.08
Google Scholar

Sharma, Swati, James B Ang, and Per G Fredriksson. 2021. “Religiosity and Climate Change Policies.” Energy Economics 101 (September): 105414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105414
Google Scholar

Shin, Faith, and Jesse L. Preston. 2021. “Green as the Gospel: The Power of Stewardship Messages to Improve Climate Change Attitudes.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 13 (4): 437–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000249
Google Scholar

Smiley, Kevin T. 2019. “A Polluting Creed: Religion and Environmental Inequality in the United States.” Sociological Perspectives 62 (6): 980–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419862229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419862229
Google Scholar

Smith, E. Keith, Lynn M. Hempel, and Kelsea MacIlroy. 2018. “What’s ‘Evangelical’ Got to Do with It? Disentangling the Impact of Evangelical Protestantism on Environmental Outcomes.” Environmental Politics 27 (2): 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1384185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1384185
Google Scholar

Stark, Rodney. 2014. How the West Was Won: The Neglected Story of the Triumph of Modernity. Wilmington: ISI Books.
Google Scholar

Sutton, Marc Q., and Eugene N. Anderson. 2004. Introduction to Cultural Ecology. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
Google Scholar

Tanzella-Nitti, Giuseppe. 2005. “The Two Books Prior to the Scientific Revolution.” Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith 57 (3): 235–48.
Google Scholar

Thorndike, Robert L. 1953. “Who Belongs in the Family?” Psychometrika 1953 18:4 18 (4): 267–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289263
Google Scholar

Tourangeau, Roger, Lance J. Rips, and Kenneth Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819322
Google Scholar

Toynbee, Arnold. 1934. A Study of History. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

White, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155 (3767): 1203–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1720120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
Google Scholar

Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Pablo García-García

pagag@unileon.es
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-1966

Affiliation:

University of León, Spain