Filozoficzny realizm między naturą a zdrowym rozsądkiem, część I

Mario De Caro

doi:10.21697/seb.2017.15.4.09

Published: 2017-12-31

Vol. 15 No. 4 (2017)

Philosophical realism between nature and common sense. Part I

Mario De Caro

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2017.15.4.09

Abstract

Over the last three decades, the number of philosophers who would define themselves as realists has been steadily growing all over the world, both in the continental and in the analytic tradition. In the first part of the article, the terms of the contemporary discussion on realism and antirealism will be introduced. Then a specific family of views, which could be called „common sense realism”, will be presented and discussed, also considering its attitude towards science.

Keywords:

realism, antirealism, commonsense realism

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Caro, M. D. (2017). Philosophical realism between nature and common sense. Part I. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 15(4), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2017.15.4.09

Cited by / Share

References

Bourget D., Chalmers D., 2014, What do Philosophers Believe?, Philosophical Papers, 170, s. 465-500.
Google Scholar

Chakravartty A., 2007, A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Knowing the Unobservable, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Ciancio C., 2004, Il senso comune nel pensiero ermeneutico, w: E. Agazzi (a cura di), „Valore e limiti del senso comune”, Franco Angeli, Mediolan, 153–164.
Google Scholar

De Caro M., 2011, Review of J. Ritchie, „Understanding Naturalism”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, t. 19(4), 527–531.
Google Scholar

Dummett M., 1978, Truth and Other Enigmas, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Google Scholar

Forrest P., 1994, Why most of us should be scientific realists: A reply to van Fraassen, The Monist, nr 77 (1), 47–71.
Google Scholar

Heil J., 1989, Recent Work in Realism and Anti-realism, Philosophical Books, nr 30(2), 65–73.
Google Scholar

Honderich T., 1993, How Free Are You? The Determinism Problem, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Husserl E., 1970, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Northwestern University Press, Chicago.
Google Scholar

Ladyman J., 1998, What is structural realism?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, nr 29, 409–424.
Google Scholar

Ladyman J., 2014, Structural Realism, w: E.N. Zalta (red.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism.
Google Scholar

Martin R. N. D, 1991, Pierre Duhem. Philosophy and History in the Work of a Believing Phycist, Open Court, La Salle.
Google Scholar

Moran D., 2012, Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Morganti M., 2004, On the preferability of epistemic structural realism, Synthese, nr 142, 81–107.
Google Scholar

Murphy J. W., 1984, Jacques Derrida: A Rhetoric that Deconstructs Common Sense, Diogenes, nr 128(32), 125-140.
Google Scholar

Psillos S., 2001, Is structural realism possible?, Philosophy of Science, nr 68 (Supplementary Volume), 13–24.
Google Scholar

Psillos S., 2006, The Structure, the Whole Structure and Nothing But the Structure?, Philosophy of Science, nr 73, 560–570.
Google Scholar

Putnam H., 1975, What Is Mathematical Truth?,” w: Putman H., „Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers”, t. I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 60–78.
Google Scholar

Searle J., 2007, Freedom and Neurobiology. Reflections Free Will, Language, and Political Power, Columbia University Press, Nowy Jork.
Google Scholar

van Fraassen B., 2003, From a View of Science to a New Empiricism, w: B. Monton (red.), „Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen”, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 337–383.
Google Scholar

Watkins J., 1996, Scientific Realism versus Common Sense Realism?, w: R.S. Cohen, R. Hilpinen, Q. Renzong (red.), „Realism and Antirealism in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science”, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 219–226.
Google Scholar

Weisenberg M., Needham P., Hendry R., 2011, Philosophy of Chemistry, w: E.N. Zalta, (red.), „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy”, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chemistry/.
Google Scholar

White S. L., 2007, Empirical Psychology, Trascendental Phenomenology, and the Self, w: M. Marraffa, M. De Caro, F. Ferretti (red.), „Cartographies of the Mind. Philosophy and Psychology in Intersection”, Springer, Dordrecht, 243–254.
Google Scholar

Willard D., 2002, The World Well Won. Husserl’s Epistemic Realism One Hundred Years Later, w: D.D. Zahavi, F. Stjernfelt (red.), „One Hundred Years of Phenomenology”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht and Boston, 69–78.
Google Scholar

Wiltsche H. A., 2012, What is Wrong with Husserl’s Scientific Anti-Realism?, Inquiry, nr 55(2), 105–130. Worrall J., 1989, Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?, Dialectica, nr 43, 99–124.
Google Scholar