Anscombe, Elizabeth. 1958. „Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33: 1-19.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100037943
Google Scholar
Cafaro, Philip. 2001. „Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson: Towards an Environmental Virtue Ethics.” Environmental Ethics 1: 3-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200123135
Google Scholar
Chemero, Anthony. 2009. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001
Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2015. Environmental Skill. Motivation, Knowledge, and the Possibility of a Non-Romantic Environmental Ethics. New York: Routlege.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714158
Google Scholar
Dzwonkowska, Dominika. 2019. Etyka cnót środowiskowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
Google Scholar
Enoch. David. 2006. „Agency, Schmagency: Why Normativity Won't Come from What Is Constitutive of Action.” Philosophical Review 115: 169-198.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2005-014
Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Hill, Te. 1983. „Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environment.” Environmental Ethics 3: 211-224.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19835327
Google Scholar
Janikowski, Wacław. 2007. “Określenie pojęć internalizmu i eksternalizmu etycznego.” Etyka 40: 130-143.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.434
Google Scholar
Jayawickreme, Eranda, and Anthony Chemero. 2008. “Ecological Moral Realism.” Review of General Psychology 12: 118-126.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.2.118
Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554476
Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.003.0001
Google Scholar
Rosati, Connie S. 2003. “Agency and the Open Question Argument.” Ethics 113: 490-527.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/345625
Google Scholar
Stanford, Kyle P. 2019. “Unconceived Alternatives and Conservatism in Science: The Impact of Professionalization, Peer-review, and Big Science.” Synthese 196(10): 3915-3932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0856-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0856-4
Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 4157(185): 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Wachowski, Witold M. (2018). “Normatywność usytuowana. Ujęcie ekologiczne” (“Situated normativity. An ecological approach”). Studia Philosophiae Christianae 1(54): 143-165. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2018.54.1.16.
Google Scholar
Warren, William H. 1984. „Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10(5): 683-703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.683
Google Scholar