Archer, M. (2010). Can Reflexivity and Habitus Work in Tandem?. W M. Archer (red.), Conversations about Reflexivity (123-143). Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867556
Google Scholar
Archer, M. (2013). Człowieczeństwo. Problem sprawstwa. Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS.
Google Scholar
Archer, M. (2015). Morfogeneza – ramy wyjaśniające realizmu. Uniwersyteckie Czasopismo Socjologiczne, 10, 16-46.
Google Scholar
Bickhard, M.H., Richie, D.M. (1983). On the Nature of Representation. Praeger.
Google Scholar
Blewett, C., Hugo, W. (2016). Actant Affordances: a Brief History of Affordance Theory and a Latourian Extension for Education Technology Research. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 55-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v4i1.50
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2008). Zmysł praktyczny. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L.J.D. (2001). Zaproszenie do socjologii refleksyjnej. Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar
Bygstad, B., Munkvold, E., i Volkoff, O. (2016). Identifying Generative Mechanisms through Affordances: A Framework for Critical Realist Data Analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 83-96.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.13
Google Scholar
Caetano, A. (2015). Defining Personal Reflexivity: A Critical Reading of Archer’s Approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 60-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014549684
Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2000). The Power of Identity. Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Cerulo, K. (2014). Continuing the Story: Maximizing the Intersections of Cognitive Science and Sociology. Sociological Forum, 29(4), 1012-1019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12135
Google Scholar
Chemero, A. (2011). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Cichocki, R. (2003). Podmiotowość w społeczeństwie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (1986). Perception with an Eye for Motion. The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Danermark, B., Ekström, M., i Karlsson, J. (2019). Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351017831
Google Scholar
Domecka, M. (2013). Dualność czy dualizm? Relacje pomiędzy strukturą i podmiotowym sprawstwem we współczesnych debatach teoretycznych. W A. Mrozowicki, O. Nowaczyk, I. Szlachcicowa (red.), Sprawstwo – teorie, metody, badania empiryczne w naukach społecznych (103-115). Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS.
Google Scholar
Donati, P., Archer, M. (2015). The Relational Subject. Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226780
Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, D. (2007). Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an Emergentist Theory of Action. Sociological Theory, 25(4), 325-349.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00312.x
Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761720
Google Scholar
Elder-Vass, D. (2017). Materialising Social Ontology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(5), 1437-1451.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex038
Google Scholar
Gaver, W. (1996). Situating Action II: Affordances for Interaction: The Social Is Material for Design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111-129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0802_2
Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (2015). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (2012). Nowoczesność i tożsamość. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Heras-Escribano, M. (2019). The Philosophy of Affordances. Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98830-6
Google Scholar
Heras-Escribano, M., De Pinedo-Garcia, M. (2018). Affordances and Landscapes: Overcoming the Nature – Culture Dichotomy through Niche Construction Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2294). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02294
Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
Google Scholar
Kaidesoja, T. (2013). Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology. Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203753484
Google Scholar
Kaidesoja, T., Hyyryläinen, M., i Puustinen, R. (2022). Two Traditions of Cognitive Sociology: An Analysis and Assessment of their Cognitive and Methodological Assumptions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 52(3), 1-20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12341
Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2010). Splatając na nowo to, co społeczne. Wprowadzenie do teorii aktora-sieci. Universitas.
Google Scholar
Leonardi, P. (2013). When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 749-775.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.04
Google Scholar
Lubiszewski, D. (2012). Odnaleźć się w gąszczu ofert. Psychologia ekologiczna dla bardzo początkujących. Avant, 2(3), 267-270.
Google Scholar
Mantey, D. (2020). Socjologiczne dualizmy z perspektywy badań nad rozwojem społeczno-gospodarczym. Przegląd Geograficzny, 92(4), 521-542.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2020.4.4
Google Scholar
McGann, M. (2014). Enacting a Social Ecology: Radically Embodied Intersubjectivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 1321(5). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01321.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01321
Google Scholar
Menary, R. (2011). Our Glassy Essence: The Fallible Self in Pragmatist Thought. W S. Gallagher (red.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self (609-632). Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548019.003.0027
Google Scholar
Morgagni, S. (2012). Affordances as Possible Actions: Elements for a Semiotic Approach. W Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (867-878). Univesidade da Coruna.
Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. (1995). Back to Sociological Theory: the Construction of Social Orders. Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Norman, D. (1999). Affordance, Conventions, and Design. Interactions, 6(3), 38-42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168
Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1435-1448.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Google Scholar
Poczobut, R. (2016). Kategoria osoby w kontekście kognitywistyki. Ethos, 4(116), 133-151.
Google Scholar
Ramstead, M, Veissiere, S., i Kirmayer, L. (2016). Cultural Affordances: Scaffolding Local Worlds Through Shared Intentionality and Regimes of Attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1090). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090
Google Scholar
Reed, E.S. (1993). The intention to use a specific affordance: a conceptual framework for psychology. W R.H. Wozniak, K. Fisher (red.), Development in context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments (45-76). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Rietveld, E., Kiverstein, J. (2014). A Rich Landscape of Affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26, 325-352.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
Google Scholar
Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A., i Rubio, A. (2018). Defining Affordances in Social Media Research: A literature Review. W Proceeding of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2203-2212). University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Google Scholar
Sayer, A. (2010). Reflexivity and the Habitus. W M. Archer (red.), Conversations about Reflexivity (108-122). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Szlachcicowa, I., Nowaczyk, O., i Mrozowicki, A. (2013). Sprawstwo a dylematy współczesnych nauk społecznych. Wprowadzenie. W A. Mrozowicki, O. Nowaczyk, I. Szlachcicowa (red.), Sprawstwo – teorie, metody, badania empiryczne w naukach społecznych (7-18). Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS.
Google Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1989). Socjologiczna teoria podmiotowości. W P. Buczkowski, R. Cichocki (red.), Podmiotowość: możliwość, rzeczywistość, konieczność (11-20). Redakcja Wydawnictw Ośrodka Analiz Społecznych ZMW.
Google Scholar
Turvey, M. (1992). Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4, 173-187.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
Google Scholar
Twardowski, M. (2015). „Systemizm” Mario Bungego – współczesna postać materializmu. Resovia Sacra, 22, 315-332.
Google Scholar
Van Dijk, L., Rietveld, E. (2016). Foregrounding Sociomaterial Practice in Our Understanding of Affordances: The Skilled Intentionality Framework. Frontiers Psychology, 1969(7). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01969.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01969
Google Scholar
Volkoff, O., Strong, D. (2013). Critical Realism and Affordances: Theorizing IT-Associated Organizational Change Processes. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819-834.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.07
Google Scholar
Wachowski, W. (2022). Poznanie rozproszone. Od heurystyk do mechanizmów. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Wang, J., i Tang, Q. (2018). A Review of Application of Affordance Theory in Information Systems. Journal of Service Science and Management, 11, 56-70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2018.111006
Google Scholar
Warren, W.H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual Guidance of Stair Climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683-703.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.683
Google Scholar
Weeks, J., Fayard, A.-L. (2014). The Affordance of Practice. The Influence of Structure and Setting on Practice. Information and Organization, 24(4), 236-249.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001
Google Scholar
Wielecki, K. (2012). Kryzys i socjologia. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323510147
Google Scholar
https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.04
English
Język Polski