Typy i funkcje refleksji w myśli tomistycznej

Joanna Sośnicka

doi:10.21697/2018.54.4.04

Published: 2019-11-08

Vol. 54 No. 4 (2018)

On the sources of cognition – types and functions of reflection in the light of Thomas Aquinas’s philosophy

Joanna Sośnicka

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

Section: Papers

https://doi.org/10.21697/2018.54.4.04

Abstract

In Modern Age, reflection was identified with the object of philosophical cognition. Epistemology took a significant part of metaphysical research and as a result, rationalism separated itself from realism, and realism from real existing beings. Different theories of cognition and of the object of cognition assumed internally consistent but quite distinct philosophical systems. In philosophy, the notion of reflection took peculiar meaning and even today it plays a significant role in the understanding of the object of cognition and experiencing a subject.
Saint Thomas uses the nouns refelxio and reditio. The meaning of the Latin word reditio – “return move” underlines the natural dynamism of human cognition. A move fully realizes itself in the return move to its source, thus making a full circle: it starts with the contact of the cognizing object with the subject and finishes with experiencing object. The reflection is a movement, thanks to which one understands that he is able to cognize, and understands that he fully cognizes once he has cognized. The division into reflexio in actu exercito and reflexio in actu signato allows us to see the main functions of the reflection. Reflection binds consciousness with identity “I” that is human identity, and it gives it coherent, subjective sense, which structures itself by the cognition of external existing objects.

Keywords:

Aquinas, cognition, reflection, transcendence, immanence

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Sośnicka, J. (2019). On the sources of cognition – types and functions of reflection in the light of Thomas Aquinas’s philosophy. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 54(4), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.21697/2018.54.4.04

Cited by / Share

References

Black D., Consciousness and self-Knowledge in Aquinas’s Critique of Averroes’s Psychology, Journal of the History of Philosophy 3(1993), 349–385.
Google Scholar

Chudy W., Refleksja a poznanie bytu, RW KUL, Lublin 1984.
Google Scholar

Chudy W., Rozwój filozofowania a „pułapka refleksji”, RW KUL, Lublin 1995.
Google Scholar

Jougan A., Słownik kościelny łacińsko-polski, Wydawnictwo Archidiecezji Warszawskiej, Warszawa 1992.
Google Scholar

Krąpiec M.A., Ja człowiek, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2005.
Google Scholar

Krąpiec M.A., Metafizyka, RW KUL, Lublin 1985.
Google Scholar

Krąpiec M.A., Realizm ludzkiego poznania, RW KUL, Lublin 1995.
Google Scholar

Lambert R., Self Knowledge in Thomas Aquinas: The Angelic Doctor on the Soul’s Knowledge on Itself, AuthorHouse 2007.
Google Scholar

Pasnau R., Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study on Summa theologiae, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012.
Google Scholar

Scarpelli Cory T., Aquinas on Human Self-Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
Google Scholar

Scarpelli Cory T., The Reflexivity of Incorporeal Acts as Source of Freedom and Subjectivity in Aquinas, w: Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, red. J. Kankua, T. Ekenberg, Springer, Berlin 2016.
Google Scholar

Stępień A.B., Wprowadzenie do filozofii, TN KUL, Lublin 2001.
Google Scholar

Tomasz z Akwinu, Dysputy problemowe o dobru, o pożądaniu dobra i o woli, tłum. z łac. A. Białek, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2003.
Google Scholar

Tomasz z Akwinu, Dysputy problemowe o prawdzie, tłum z łac. A. Białek, RW KUL, Lublin 1999.
Google Scholar

Tomasz z Akwinu, Traktat o człowieku. Summa teologiczna 1, 75-89,oprac. S. Świeżawski, Pallottinum, Poznań 1956.
Google Scholar

Tomasz z Akwinu, Summa contra gentiles. Prawda wiary chrześcijańskiej w dyskusji z poganami, innowiercami i błądzącymi, t. 2, tłum. z łac. W. Zega, Wyd. „W drodze”, Poznań 2007.
Google Scholar