Animals and Artificial Intelligence: Nonhumans as Moral Agents?

Barbora Baďurová

doi:10.21697/seb.5814

Published: 2024-04-15

Animals and Artificial Intelligence: Nonhumans as Moral Agents?

Barbora Baďurová

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5814

Abstract

There is a widely debated issue regarding the status and impact of exponentially growing artificial intelligence. The article deals with the problem of the moral agency of animals, and artificial intelligence. The author addresses several criteria for moral agents and tries to find the answer to the question of whether we can treat animals and AI as moral agents. The author uses mostly method of philosophical analysis and comparative method. The author claims that moral agency is not a necessary condition for moral status and doubts the practicality of attributing full moral agency to animals and AI. Moreover, claims that moral agency comes in degrees and different kinds and therefore we have to consider the complex nature of moral agency when dealing with moral actions. For instance, even human moral agents are not all on the same level of development as suggested not just by empirical evidence but also virtue ethics.

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, animals, humans, ethics, moral agency, animal ethics, AI ethics, ethics of artificial intelligence

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Baďurová, B. (2024). Animals and Artificial Intelligence: Nonhumans as Moral Agents?. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5814

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Baum, Seth D., and Andrea Owe. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence Needs Environmental Ethics.” Ethics, Policy & Environment, 26(1):139-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2076538.
Google Scholar

Behdadi, Dorna. 2021. “A Practice-Focused Case for Animal Moral Agency.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38: 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12486.
Google Scholar

Bringsjord, Selmer, and Han Xiao. 2000. “A Refutation of Penrose’s Gödelian Case Against Artificial Intelligence.” In: Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 12: 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130050111455
Google Scholar

Bringsjord, Selmer, and Naveen Sundar Govindarajulu. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed February 18, 2024. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artificial-intelligence/
Google Scholar

ChatGPT, Prompt: “Are you a moral agent?” Accessed January 29, 2023. https://chat.openai.com/auth/login?next=%2Fc%2F5aa8bd43-4190-40dd-91b1-9b018b41c7f3.
Google Scholar

Chiappetta, Allessia. 2023. “Navigating the AI Frontier: European Parliamentary Insights On Bias And Regulation, Preceding The AI Act.” Internet Policy Review 12(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.4.1733.
Google Scholar

Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2020. AI Ethics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

De Waal, Frans. 2009. Good Natured. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

De Waal, Frans. 2019. The Age of Empathy. Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. London: Souvenir Press.
Google Scholar

Dinzelbacher, Peter. 2002. “Animal Trials: A Multidisciplinary Approach.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 32(3): 405–421. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3656215.
Google Scholar

Domingos, Pedro. 2017. The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. London: Penguin Random House.
Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert. 1972. What Computers Can’t Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Dzwonkowska, Dominika. 2020. “Environmental Vices as Ethical and Anthropological Roots of the Environmental Crisis.” Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 18(5): 171-80. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.15.
Google Scholar

Floridi, Luciano, and Taddeo Mariarosaria. 2016. “What Is Data Ethics?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374(2083): 20160360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.
Google Scholar

Génova, Gonzalo, Victor Moreno, and Marcos Román González. 2023. “Machine Ethics: Do Androids Dream of Being Good People?” Sci Eng Ethics 29(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00433-5.
Google Scholar

Goodall, Jane. 2012. Jane Goodall’s Animal World, Chimps. Byron Preiss.
Google Scholar

Greshko, Michael. 2018. “Meet Sophia, the robot that looks almost human.” National Geographic, May 18, 2018. Online: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/article/sophia-robot-artificial-intelligence-science.
Google Scholar

Grozdanoff, Boris D., Zdravko Popov, Silviya Serafimova. 2023. Rationality and Ethics in Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar

Harris, Sam. 2012. Free Will. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 2018. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Yale: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Kouroupis, Konstantinos. 2023. “The AI Act in light of the EU Digital Agenda: A critical approach.” Journal of Data Protection & Privacy 5(3): 216-229. Accessed February 18, 2024. https://hstalks.com/article/7448/the-ai-act-in-light-of-the-eu-digital-agenda-a-cri/.
Google Scholar

Lillehammer, Hallvard (ed). 2022. The Trolley Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

McGovern, Amy, Imme Ebert-Uphoff, David John Gagne II, Ann Bostrom. 2022. “Why we need to focus on developing ethical, responsible, and trustworthy artificial intelligence approaches for environmental science.” Environmental Data Science 1:e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2022.5.
Google Scholar

Mitchell, Melanie. 2020. Artificial Intelligence. A Guide for Thinking Humans. New York: Pelican Press.
Google Scholar

Moor, James H. 2006. “The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(4): 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.80.
Google Scholar

Müller, Vincent C. 2020. “Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed February 18, 2024. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/.
Google Scholar

Nordgren, Anders. 2022. “Artificial intelligence and climate change: ethical issues.” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 21(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-11-2021-0106.
Google Scholar

Nyholm, Sven. 2018. “Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human–Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24(4): 1201–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9943-x.
Google Scholar

O’Connor, Sinead, Helen Liu. 2023. “Gender bias perpetuation and mitigation in AI technologies: challenges and opportunities.” AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01675-4.
Google Scholar

Orlans, F. Barbara. 1998. The Human Use of Animals: Case Studies in Ethical Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Puzio, Anna. 2024. “Not Relational Enough? Towards an Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics.” Philosophy and Technology 37: 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00730-2.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. 2004. Case for Animal Rights. Oakland: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Vizzuett, Liliana, Ismael Espinosa-Curiel, Humberto Pérez-Espinosa. 2022. “Digital Technology Supporting the Remote Human-Dog Interaction. Scoping Review.” Animals 13(4):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040699.
Google Scholar

Rowlands, Mark. 2012. Can Animals Be Moral? New York: OUP USA.
Google Scholar

Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig. 2009. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar

Scheler, Max. 2009. The Human Place in the Cosmos. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1980. “Minds, Brains and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756.
Google Scholar

Shapiro, Paul. 2006. “Moral Agency in Other Animals.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27(4):357-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-006-9010-0.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, Yip Fai Tse. 2023. “AI ethics: the case for including animals.” AI Ethics 3:539–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00187-z.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. 2009. Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement. New York: Ecco Book/Harper Perennial.
Google Scholar

Turing, Alan. 1980. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Creative Computing 6(1): 44-53.
Google Scholar

World Economic Forum. 2023. “These are the jobs most likely to be lost – and created – because of AI.” Accessed April 04, 2024. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/05/jobs-lost-created-ai-gpt/.
Google Scholar