The Problem of Animal Rights in Selected Works by Dorota Probucka

Joanna Glensk

doi:10.21697/seb.5817

Published: 2024-08-06

Vol. 22 No. 3 (2024)

The Problem of Animal Rights in Selected Works by Dorota Probucka

Joanna Glensk

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5817

Abstract

This article presents the idea of animal rights as perceived by a Polish philosopher and ethicist, Dorota Probucka. It is divided into three sections that delve into the development and significance of animal rights from the perspectives of both proponents and critics of the idea. The first section provides an overview of the turning points in the history and evolution of animal rights, referring to the main thinkers who had the fundamental impact on their development. The second part defines the concept of animal rights and explains why extending fundamental rights to at least some non-human beings is important from both moral and legal perspectives. The third part compares the arguments of the proponents and opponents of the idea of granting basic rights to animals. The philosophers’ positions presented by Probucka prove that beings capable of suffering, regardless of their intellectual abilities, deserve moral consideration. This stance is supported by numerous arguments from various fields of science, demonstrating the degree of awareness and emotional complexity of animals. These arguments should contribute to the recognition of animal rights within a moral and legal context. The article also emphasizes the need for legal reforms, including the need to introduce formal legal structures, such as the appointment of the so-called Animal Rights Ombudsman, who could represent animals at an institutional level. Considering the growing bioethical and biocentric awareness, the article emphasizes the need to redefine our attitude towards animals. It also postulates the necessity of implementing legal reforms that will make animals full participants of the moral community, which is of key importance for the future of both people and animals on our planet.

Keywords:

aniaml rights, anthropocentirsm, factory farming, vegan, animal liberation, animal ethics, ombudsman, animal welfare, law to prevent cruelty

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Glensk, J. (2024). The Problem of Animal Rights in Selected Works by Dorota Probucka. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 22(3), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5817

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Bentham, Jeremy. 2000. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 1992. The Animal Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597961
Google Scholar

Cohen, Carl, Tom Regan. 2001. The Animal Rights Debate. New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar

DeGrazia, David. 1996. Taking Animal Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172967
Google Scholar

DeGrazia, David. 2006. “On the Question of Personhood beyond Homo Sapiens.” In In Defense of Animals, edited by Peter Singer, 40-53. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. 1984. “Rights as Trumps.” In Theories of Rights, edited by Jeremy Waldron, 162-167. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. 1972. Social Philosophy. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. 1974. Philosophy and Enviroment Crisis. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Google Scholar

Francione, Gary. 1995. Animals, Property and the Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Frey, Raymond G. 1980. Interests and Rights. The Case Against Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Garner, Bryan A. 1999. Black’s Law Dictionary. 7th ed. St. Paul: West Group.
Google Scholar

Low, Philip. 2012. “The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness.” Proceedings of the Francis Crick Memorial Conference. Churchill College, Cambridge University.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2014a. Filozoficzne podstawy idei praw zwierząt [Philosophical Foundations of the Idea of Animal Rights]. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych UNIVERSITAS.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2014b. “Sama odmowa spożywania mięsa nie uczyni naszego sumienia czystym [Simply refusing to eat meat will not make our conscience clear]”. Dariusz Gzyra's interview with Dorota Probudzka by Gzyra Dariusz. Accessed May 28, 2024. https://krytykapolityczna.pl/kraj/probucka-sama-odmowa-spozywania-miesa-nie-uczyni-naszego-sumienia-czystym/.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2015. Prawa zwierząt [Animal Rights]. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych UNIVERSITAS.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2017. “Spór o prawa zwierząt [Dispute over animal rights].” Presented at the conference “Człowiek i inne gatunki – łódzkie spotkania ekozoficzne.” Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, University of Łódź, Łódź. Accessed March 18, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=jD417Jrx0DY.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2019. “Edukacja etyczna młodzieży w XXI wieku [Ethical education of young people in the 21st century].” Presented at the conference “Edukacja XXI wieku. Strategie zarządzania i kierunki rozwoju.” Institute of Philosophy and Sociology at the University of the National Education Commission, Kraków. Accessed May 30, 2024. https://youtu.be/5p_2nmfIArM?si=i-FIOk-DbOsYPK_7.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2020a. “Etyczne potępienie myślistwa [Ethical condemnation of hunting].” In Etyczne potępienie myślistwa [Ethical condemnation of hunting], edited by Dorota Probucka, 205-224. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych UNIVERSITAS.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2020b. “Myślistwo hobbystyczne, czyli zabawa w bezkarne mordowanie [Hobby hunting: a game of unpunished killing].” In Etyczne potępienie myślistwa [Ethical condemnation of hunting], edited by Dorota Probucka, 19-29. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych UNIVERSITAS.
Google Scholar

Probucka, Dorota. 2022. “Rozważania o etyce i ekologii, czyli gdzie podziała się kraina miodu? [Reflections on Ethics and Ecology, or Where Has the Land of Honey Gone?].” In Etyka i ekologia [Ethics and Ecology], edited by Dorota Probucka, 139-148. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SILVA RERUM.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. 2001. Defending Animal Rights. Urbana-Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar

Rowlands, Mark. 1998. Animal Rights. A Philosophical Defence. New York: Palgrave Mac Millan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26780-4
Google Scholar

Ryder, Richard D. 1975. Victims of Science. The Use of Animals in Research. London: Davis-Poynter.
Google Scholar

Ryder, Richard D. 1989. Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Toward Speciesism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Ryder, Richard D. 2017. Speciesism, Painism and Happiness a Morality for the Twenty-first Century. Luton: Andrews UK Limited.
Google Scholar

Salt, Henry. 1894. Animal Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress. London: Macmillan & Co.
Google Scholar

Scruton, Roger. 2000. Animal Rights and Wrongs. London: Demos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752756200006244
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. 1978. “The Parable of the Fox and the Unliberated Animal.” Ethics 88(2): 119-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292062
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter. 1993. Practical Ethic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Singer, Peter.2002. Animal Liberation. New York: Ecco Press.
Google Scholar