Podmiotowość lasu

Krystyna Najder-Stefaniak

doi:10.21697/seb.2019.17.1.04

Published: 2019-03-31

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2019)

The forest’s subjectivity

Krystyna Najder-Stefaniak

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2019.17.1.04

Abstract

The author finds justification for ‘forest rights’ in the subjective existence of ecosystems. The concept of life helps her to understand the subjectivity of ecosystems. She notes that the specificity of life is the creative duration that connects the three dimensions of time: past, present and future. Thinking about dependencies in the ecosystemrelation scheme helps to understand how it is possible to be so creative. The author uses the concept of the ‘subject of responsibility’, which is found in Roman Ingarden’s work ‘On Responsibility and its Ontical Foundations’. Being the subject of responsibility justifies having rights that allow you to contribute to the pursuit of TRUTH, GOOD and BEAUTY. Thanks to ecosystem activity, which is the forest itself, these three universal values can be realized.

Keywords:

ecosystem, subjectivity, responsibility, subject of responsibility

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Najder-Stefaniak, K. (2019). The forest’s subjectivity. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 17(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2019.17.1.04

Cited by / Share

References

Bertalanffy L. von, 1984, Ogólna teoria systemów. Podstawy, rozwój, zastosowania, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Bocheński J. M., 1994, O systemie, Principia, t. VIII-IX.
Google Scholar

Bunge M., 1977, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. 3, Ontology I: the Furniture of the World, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9924-0
Google Scholar

Dołęga J. M., 2001, Z filozofii nauk ekologicznych, w: Ochrona środowiska społeczno-przyrodniczego w filozofii i teologii, red. J.M. Dołęga, J.W. Czartoszewski, A. Skowroński, Wydawnictwo UKSW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Filek J. (red. nauk.), 2004, Filozofia odpowiedzialności XX wieku. Teksty źródłowe, Wyd. UJ, Krakow.
Google Scholar

Foucault M., 2001, L’hermeneutique du sujet, Paris.
Google Scholar

Foucault M., 1995, Historia seksualności, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Herodot, 2005, Dzieje, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Ingarden R., 1972, O odpowiedzialności i jej podstawach ontycznych, w: tenże, Książeczka o człowieku, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Morin E., 1977, Zaginiony paradygmat – natura ludzka, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Pseudo-Platon, 1973, Alkibiades1 i inne dialogi oraz Defilicje, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Plessner H., 1975, Die Stufen des Organischen. Einleiturg In die philosophische Antropologie, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin – New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110845341
Google Scholar

Rorty R., 1991, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2505056
Google Scholar

Simmel G., 2007, Filozofia kultury. Wybór esejów, Krakow.
Google Scholar

Tansley A. G., 1935, The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms, Ecology, 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070
Google Scholar