The Problem of the Conscience Clause of Healthcare Professionals in Italy in the Years 2017-2020

Andrzej Kobyliński

doi:10.21697/seb.2020.18.3.05

Published: 2020-09-30

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2020)

The Problem of the Conscience Clause of Healthcare Professionals in Italy in the Years 2017-2020

Andrzej Kobyliński

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.3.05

Abstract

The main goal of the article is to analyse the key elements of the living will in Italy and present the dispute regarding the understanding of the conscience clause of healthcare professionals. In the country on the Tiber, a law on the living will was passed in 2017. A living will consists in the anticipatory expression of ‘will’, by an adult or legal guardian acting in full possession of their mental faculties, concerning the possible administration or discontinuation of certain medical therapies in the future. The conscience clause, on the other hand, means the right to refuse to take such actions, which a particular person considers to be contrary to their personal convictions. The Italian law on the living will does not contain a provision on the conscience clause. For this reason, an ethical and legal problem arose for healthcare professionals, who refused to comply with the wishes of their patients for moral or religious reasons, for example by discontinuing artificial hydration or nutrition, thus, leading to the patient’s death. The ethical and legal dispute in Italy is part of a contemporary global debate on conscience clauses, euthanasia, assisted suicide, human rights, and the dignity of human life. Analyses have shown that healthcare professionals should be guaranteed the right, not to perform such medical procedures, which are contrary to their moral and religious convictions.

Keywords:

living will, conscience clause, human rights, euthanasia, assisted suicide

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Kobyliński, A. (2020). The Problem of the Conscience Clause of Healthcare Professionals in Italy in the Years 2017-2020. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 18(3), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.3.05

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Baldini, Gianni. 2019. “La pianificazione condivisa delle cure: prime riflessioni a margine della l. 219/2017.” In La relazione di cura dopo la legge 219/2017. Una prospettiva interdisciplinare, edited by Massimo Foglia, 129-147. Pisa: Pacini Editore.
Google Scholar

Cancelli, Ferdinando. 2018. “Di fronte alle politiche su aborto ed eutanasia. In pericolo l’obiezione di coscienza.” L’Osservatore Romano 158(39): 1.
Google Scholar

Cembrani, Fabio, and Gianluca Cembrani. 2016. L’obiezione di coscienza nella relazione di cura. Torino: Edizonio SEEd.
Google Scholar

Daloiso, Viviana. 2017. “Obiezione do coscienza? Per le Dat sarà garantita.” Avvenire 50(301): 10.
Google Scholar

Dovico, Ermes. 2020. “Attacco globale all’obiezione di coscienza.” La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, March 17, 2020. https://www.lanuovabq.it/it/attacco-globale-allobiezione-di-coscienza.
Google Scholar

Guerra, Marco. 2017. “Lo Stato contro gli ospedali cattolici, il conflitto che verrà.” La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, Dicember 22, 2017. http://lanuovabq.it/it/lo-stato-contro-gli-ospedali-cattolici-il-conflitto-che-verra.
Google Scholar

Kobyliński, Andrzej. 2009. “The Genesis and Nature of «New Human Rights».” In Etyczne wymiary praw człowieka, edited by Ryszard Moń and Andrzej Kobyliński, 133-142. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UKSW.
Google Scholar

Kobyliński, Andrzej. 2015a. “Aspekty etyczno-prawne sporu o klauzulę sumienia we Włoszech w latach 2014-2015.” Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 13(3): 25-48. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2015.13.3.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2015.13.3.02
Google Scholar

Kobyliński, Andrzej. 2015b. “Nowy humanizm czy posthumanizm? Aspekty etyczno-prawne legalizacji eutanazji na świecie w latach 2000–2015.” Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 13(4): 85-114. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2015.13.4.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2015.13.4.04
Google Scholar

Kućko, Wojciech. 2016. Etica dei farmacisti in Italia. Verso una nuova comprensione e prassi alla luce della bioetica personalista. Roma: Academia Alfonsiana.
Google Scholar

Marin, Francesca. 2017. “Il fine vita e l’attribuzione di responsabilità morale.” Medicina e Morale 66(5): 617-632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2017.510
Google Scholar

Meaney, Joseph, and Marina Casini. 2016. “I diritti umani alla vita e alla coscienza e la risoluzione dei conflitti dei diritti umani.” Medicina e Morale 65(5): 633-653.
Google Scholar

Mendz, George L. 2016. “Obiezione di coscienza e relativismo morale.” Medicina e Morale 65(1): 39-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2016.427
Google Scholar

Polito, Pietro. 2013. Elogio dell’obiezione di coscienza. Milano: Biblion Edizioni.
Google Scholar

Rozmarynowska, Karolina. 2018. “Podmiotowe źródła obywatelstwa.” Seminare 39(2): 35-44. http://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2018.2.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2018.2.03
Google Scholar

Santoro, Roberta. 2019. Obiezione do coscienza e appartenenza religiosa: prime riflessioni sui profili di novità. Bari: Cacucci Editore.
Google Scholar

Sartea, Claudio. 2017. “Obiezione vostro onore. Un problematico consensus statement sull’obiezione di coscienza sanitaria.” Medicina e Morale 66(1): 63-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2017.476
Google Scholar

Scandroglio, Tommaso. 2018. “Se la bioetica degenera nel miglior interesse che verrà.” La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, April 19, 2018. http://www.lanuovabq.it/it/se-la-bioetica-degenera-nel-miglior-interesse-che-verra.
Google Scholar

Scandroglio, Tommaso. 2019. “Suicidio, la Consulta apre all’obiezione di coscienza. Che non reggerà.” La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, November 24, 2019. https://lanuovabq.it/it/suicidio-la-consulta-apre-allobiezione-di-coscienza-che-non-reggera.
Google Scholar

Waleszczyński, Andrzej. 2019. “Między troską a sprawiedliwością: Virginii Held poglądy na wspólnotę polityczną.” Roczniki Filozoficzne 67(3): 115-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf.2019.67.3-6
Google Scholar