Human subjectivity in the prenatal period

Tadeusz Biesaga

doi:10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.12

Published: 2020-12-31

Vol. 18 No. 5 (2020)

Human subjectivity in the prenatal period

Tadeusz Biesaga

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Humanistic Foundations of Environmental Protection

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.12

Abstract

The article rejects various attempts to negate the subjectivity of human embryo, formulated among others in the Polish debate entitled 'Stem cells - life for life?' and organised by the Ministry of Scientific Research and Information Technology in 2003 and 2004. The Author thinks that the proposal to treat a human embryo as a deceased donor of organs, is wrong both in the field of embryology and philosophical anthropology. It is also wrong to question the subjectivity of human embryo using various criteria of growth (developed nervous system, brain, consciousness, participation in the life of society and looking after one's own interests). For these criteria do not define humanity but describe human being in various phases of expressions of his/her human nature. That is why it is not acceptable to make the right to life conditional on the stage and degree of the actualization of humanity. Furthermore, one cannot justify the deprivation of the subjectivity of human embryo because of medical progress and the so-called good of humankind. The acceleration of progress cannot be done at the cost of life of some group of human beings.

Keywords:

human subjectivity, human embryo, stem cells, prenatal period

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Biesaga, T. (2020). Human subjectivity in the prenatal period. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 18(5), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.12

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Biesaga, Tadeusz. 2001a. „Antropologiczny status embrionu ludzkiego.” W Podstawy i zastosowania bioetyki, red. Tadeusz Biesaga, 101-113. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PAT.
Google Scholar

Biesaga, Tadeusz. 2001b. „Pojęcie osoby a jakość życia we współczesnej bioetyce.” Sympozjum 1(9): 53-64.
Google Scholar

Biesaga, Tadeusz. 2003. „Błąd antropologiczny i jego skutki w bioetyce.” W Błąd antropologiczny, red. Andrzej Maryniarczyk, i Katarzyna Stępień, 191-200. Lublin: Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu.
Google Scholar

Biesaga, Tadeusz. 2003-2004. „Etyczna ocena pozyskiwania komórek macierzystych.” Bioetyczne Zeszyty Pediatrii 1: 86-97.
Google Scholar

Biesaga, Tadeusz. 2004. „Status embrionu – stanowisko personalizmu ontologicznego.” Medycyna Praktyczna 7-8(161-162): 28-31.
Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador.
Google Scholar

MSIT (Ministry of Science and Information Technology). 2003. “Stem Cells - life for life?” (Warsaw, 15 December 2003). Conference paper.
Google Scholar

Spaemann, Robert. 2001. Osoby. O różnicy między czymś a kimś. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar

Vial Correa, Juan de Dios, and Elio Sgreccia. 1998. Identity and Statue of Human Embryo. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Google Scholar