Ahmad, Hafiz Ishfaq, et al. 2020. “The Domestication Makeup: Evolution, Survival, and Challenges.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8: 103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00103.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00103
Google Scholar
Andrews, Christopher. 1990. “The ornamental fish trade and fish conservation.” Journal of Fish Biology 37: 53-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05020.x
Google Scholar
Auliya, Mark, et al. 2016. “Trade in live reptiles, its impact on wild populations, and the role of the European market.” Biological Conservation 204: 103-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.017
Google Scholar
Azevedo, Alexandre, Leonor Guimarães, Joel Ferraz, Martin Whiting, Manuel Magalhães-Sant’Ana. 2022. “Understanding the Human–Reptile Bond: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.” Anthrozoös 35(6): 755-772. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2022.2051934.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2022.2051934
Google Scholar
Beck, Alan M., and Aaron H. Katcher. 2003. “Future directions in human-animal bond research.” American behavioral scientist 47(1): 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203255214.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203255214
Google Scholar
Boitani, Luigi, and Paolo Ciucci. 1995. “Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves.” Ethology ecology & evolution 7(1): 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1995.9522969.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1995.9522969
Google Scholar
Bush, Emma R., Sandra E. Baker, and David W. Macdonald. 2014. “Global trade in exotic pets 2006–2012.” Conservation Biology 28(3): 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12240.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12240
Google Scholar
Castellanos, Jose Miguel Beltrán. 2019. Fauna exótica invasora. Madrid: Reus.
Google Scholar
Clarke, Tara A., Kim E. Reuter, Marni LaFleur, and Melissa S. Schaefer. 2019. “A viral video and pet lemurs on Twitter.” PloS One 14(1): e0208577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208577.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208577
Google Scholar
Clevelandzoosociety.org. 2017. “Tortured, Not Tickled.” Accessed 10 January, 2025. https://www.clevelandzoosociety.org/z/2017/10/16/tortured-not-tickled.
Google Scholar
Collard, Rosemary-Claire. 2020. Animal traffic: Lively capital in the global exotic pet trade. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2022.2055336.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478012467
Google Scholar
Comité Nacional de Prevención de Lesiones. 2020. “Consenso: niños y mascotas.” Arch Argent Pediatr 118(3): S69-S106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5546/aap.2020.S69.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2020.s69
Google Scholar
Commission Decision of 1 March 2004 adopting a list of materials whose circulation or use for animal nutrition purposes is prohibited.
Google Scholar
Commission Decision of 27 December 2000 prohibiting the use of certain animal by-products in animal feed.
Google Scholar
Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 of 4 May 2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein.
Google Scholar
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), signed in 1973 and amended in 1979 and 1983.
Google Scholar
Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feeding-stuffs.
Google Scholar
Council Directive 79/373/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the marketing of compound feedingstuffs.
Google Scholar
Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra- Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market.
Google Scholar
Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC.
Google Scholar
Council Directive of 29 November 1984 amending Directive 70/524/EEC concerning additives in feeding stuffs.
Google Scholar
D’Cruze, Neil, Lauren A. Harrington, Délagnon Assou, Delphine Ronfot, David W. Macdonald, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto, and Mark Auliya. 2020b. “Searching for snakes: Ball python hunting in southern Togo, West Africa.” Nature Conservation 38: 13-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.38.47864.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.38.47864
Google Scholar
D’Cruze, Neil, Lauren A. Harrington, Délagnon Assou, Jennah Green, David W. Macdonald, Delphine Ronfot, Gabriel Hoinsoudé Segniagbeto, and Mark Auliya. 2020a. “Betting the farm: A review of Ball Python and other reptile trade from Togo, West Africa.” Nature Conservation 40: 65-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.40.48046.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.40.48046
Google Scholar
Daszak, Peter, Andrew A. Cunningham, Alex D. Hyatt. 2000. “Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife--threats to biodiversity and human health.” Science 287(5452): 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5452.443
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5452.443
Google Scholar
Davis, Christine. 1998. “Appreciating avian intelligence: The importance of a proper domestic environment.” Journal-American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 1220-1221.
Google Scholar
De la Fuente, María Fernanda, Bruna Monielly Carvalho de Araújo, Iamara da Silva Policarpo, Heliene Mota Pereira, Anna Karolina Martins Borges, Washington Luiz Silva Vieira, Gentil Alves Pereira Filho, and Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves. 2023. “Keeping reptiles as pets in Brazil: keepers’ motivations and husbandry practices.” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 19(1): 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00618-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00618-z
Google Scholar
Driscoll, Carlos A., and David W. Macdonald. 2010. “Top dogs: wolf domestication and wealth.” Journal of Biology 9: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol226.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol226
Google Scholar
EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives (European Parliament Resolution of June 9, 2021).
Google Scholar
European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals (Strasbourg, November 13, 1987).
Google Scholar
Graham, David L. 1998. “Pet birds: historical and modern perspectives on the keeper and the kept.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212(8): 1216–1219.
Google Scholar
Grant, Rachel A., V. Tamara Montrose, and Alison P. Wills. 2017. “ExNOTic: Should we be keeping exotic pets?” Animals 7(6): 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani7060047.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7060047
Google Scholar
Hare, Brian, Irene Plyusnina, Natalie Ignacio, Olesya Schepina, Anna Stepika, Richard Wrangham, and Lyudmila Trut. 2005. “Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication.” Current Biology 15(3): 226-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.040
Google Scholar
Hare, Brian, J. Call, M. Tomasello. n.d. Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis familiaris) Evol Commun Harrington. (in press).
Google Scholar
Hare, Brian, Michelle Brown, Christina Williamson, and Michael Tomasello. 2002. “The domestication of social cognition in dogs.” Science 298(5598): 1634-1636. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072702.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072702
Google Scholar
Hausmann, Anna, Gonzalo Cortés-Capano, Iain Fraser, and Enrico Di Minin. 2023. “Assessing preferences and motivations for owning exotic pets: Care matters.” Biological Conservation 281: 110007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110007
Google Scholar
Hernádi, Anna, Anna Kis, Borbála Turcsán, and József Topál. 2012. “Man’s underground best friend: domestic ferrets, unlike the wild forms, show evidence of dog-like social-cognitive skills.” PLOS One: e43267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043267.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043267
Google Scholar
Jardat, Plotine, and Léa Lansade. 2022. “Cognition and the human–animal relationship: a review of the sociocognitive skills of domestic mammals toward humans.” Animal Cognition 25(2): 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01557-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01557-6
Google Scholar
Jensen, Per, and Dominic Wright. 2022. “Behavioral Genetics and Animal Domestication.” In Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals, edited by Temple Grandin, 49-93. New York: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-02188-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85752-9.00002-0
Google Scholar
King, Tracey A. 2019. “Wild caught ornamental fish: a perspective from the UK ornamental aquatic industry on the sustainability of aquatic organisms and livelihoods.” Journal of Fish Biology 94(6): 925-936. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13900.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13900
Google Scholar
Lauren A., Mark Auliya, Harry Eckman, Alix P. Harrington, David W. Macdonald, and Neil D'Cruze. 2021. “Live wild animal exports to supply the exotic pet trade: A case study from Togo using publicly available social media data.” Conservation Science and Practice 3(7): e430. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.430.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.430
Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal.
Google Scholar
Lockwood, Julie L., et al. 2019. “When pets become pests: the role of the exotic pet trade in producing invasive vertebrate animals.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17(6): 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2059.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2059
Google Scholar
McKinley, Jean, and Thomas D. Sambrook. 2000. “Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus).” Animal Cognition 3: 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710050046.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710050046
Google Scholar
Mitchell, Mark, and Thomas N. Tully. 2008. Manual of exotic pet practice. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Google Scholar
Nekaris KA-I, et al. 2013. “Tickled to death: analysing public perceptions of ‘cute’videos of threatened species (slow lorises–Nycticebus spp.) on Web 2.0 Sites.” PloS One 8(7): 69215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069215.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069215
Google Scholar
Nijman, Vincent, and K. Anne-Isola Nekaris. 2017. “The Harry Potter effect: The rise in trade of owls as pets in Java and Bali, Indonesia.” Global Ecology and Conservation 11: 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.04.004.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.04.004
Google Scholar
Panter, Connor, Eleanor Atkinson, and Rachel White. 2019. “Quantifying the global legal trade in live CITES-listed raptors and owls for commercial purposes over a 40-year period.” Avocetta 43(1): 23-36. https://doi.org/10.30456/AVO.2019104.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30456/avo.2019104
Google Scholar
Pienaar, Elizabeth F., and Diane. J. E. Sturgeon. 2024. “Exotic pet owners’ preferences for different ectothermic taxa are based on species traits and purchase prices in the United States.” NeoBiota 91: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.91.109403.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.91.109403
Google Scholar
Podberscek, Anthony L., Elizabeth S. Paul, and James A. Serpell. 2005. Companion animals and us: exploring the relationships between people and pets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Pouil, Simon, Michael F. Tlusty, Andrew L. Rhyne, and Marc Metian. 2019. “Aquaculture of marine ornamental fish: overview of the production trends and the role of academia in research progress.” Reviews in Aquaculture 12(2): 1217-1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12381.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12381
Google Scholar
Price, Edward O. 2002. Animal domestication and behavior. Wallingford: CABI Pub. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995977.0000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995977.0010
Google Scholar
Ramsay, Neil F., Pek Kaye Abigayle Ng, Ruth M. O'Riordan, and Loke Ming Chou. 2007. “The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Asia: a review.” In Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats, edited by F. Gherardi, 161-174. Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6029-8_8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6029-8_8
Google Scholar
Regulation (EC) No 1523/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 banning the placing on the market and the import to, or export from, the Community of cat and dog fur, and products containing such fur.
Google Scholar
Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition.
Google Scholar
Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed, amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC, Council Directives 82/471/EEC, 83/228/EEC, 93/74/EEC, 93/113/EC and 96/25/EC and Commission Decision 2004/217/EC.
Google Scholar
Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC.
Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) refers again in its definition of ‘pet animal’ to an annex (‘an animal of any of the species listed in Annex I, which is kept for personal non-commercial purposes’).
Google Scholar
Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on the non-commercial movement of pet animals and repealing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
Google Scholar
Savolainen, Peter, Ya-ping Zhang, Jing Luo, Joakim Lundeberg, and Thomas Leitner. 2002. “Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs.” Science 298(5598): 1610-1613. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073906.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073906
Google Scholar
Schütz, Karin E., and Per Jensen. 2001. “Effects of resource allocation on behavioural strategies: a comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry.” Ethology 107(8): 753-765. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00703.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00703.x
Google Scholar
Schütz, Karin, Susanne Kerje, Örjan Carlborg, Lina Jacobsson, Leif Andersson, and Per Jensen. 2002. “QTL analysis of a red junglefowl× White Leghorn intercross reveals trade-off in resource allocation between behavior and production traits.” Behavior Genetics 32: 423-433. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020880211144.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020880211144
Google Scholar
Shukhova, Sofiya, and Douglas C. MacMillan. 2020. “From tigers to axolotls: Why people keep exotic pets in Russia.” People and Nature 2(4): 940-949. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10125.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10125
Google Scholar
Siriwat, Penthai, K. A. I. Nekaris, and Vincent Nijman. 2020. “Digital media and the modern-day pet trade: a test of the ‘Harry Potter effect’and the owl trade in Thailand.” Endangered Species Research 41: 7-16. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01006.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01006
Google Scholar
Smith, Kristine M., Carlos Zambrana-Torrelio, Anne White, Marianne Asmussen, Catherine Machalaba, Stephen Kennedy, Katherine Lopez, et al. 2017. “Summarizing US wildlife trade with an eye toward assessing the risk of infectious disease introduction.” EcoHealth 14: 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7
Google Scholar
Thomas‐Walters, Laura, Amy Hinsley, Daniel Bergin, Gayle Burgess, Hunter Doughty, Sara Eppel, Douglas MacFarlane, et al. 2021. “Motivations for the use and consumption of wildlife products.” Conservation Biology 35(2): 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13578.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13578
Google Scholar
Toland, Elaine, Monica Bando, Michèle Hamers, Vanessa Cadenas, Rob Laidlaw, Albert Martínez-Silvestre, and Paul van der Wielen. 2020. “Turning negatives into positives for pet trading and keeping: A review of positive lists.” Animals 10(12): 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122371.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122371
Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, and Josep Call. 1997. Primate cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195106237.001.0001
Google Scholar
Toomes, Adam, Pablo García‐Díaz, Oliver C. Stringham, Joshua V. Ross, Lewis Mitchell, and Phillip Cassey. 2022. “Drivers of the Australian native pet trade: The role of species traits, socioeconomic attributes and regulatory systems.” Journal of Applied Ecology 59(5): 1268-1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14138.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14138
Google Scholar
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (30 March 2010).
Google Scholar
Vall-llosera, Miquel, and Phillip Cassey. 2017. “Physical attractiveness, constraints to the trade and handling requirements drive the variation in species availability in the Australian cagebird trade.” Ecological Economics 131: 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.015
Google Scholar
Van Wilgen, N. J., J. R. U. Wilson, J. Elith, B. A. Wintle, and D. M. Richardson. 2010. “Alien invaders and reptile traders: what drives the live animal trade in South Africa?” Animal Conservation 13: 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00298.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00298.x
Google Scholar
Van Wilgen, N.J., et al. 2010. “Alien invaders and reptile traders: what drives the live animal trade in South Africa?” Animal Conservation 13: 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00298.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00298.x
Google Scholar
Vince, Claire. 2025. “Australian Museum Forensics combats illegal wildlife trade of echidnat.” Accessed 10 January, 2025. https://australian.museum/about/organisation/media-centre/illegal-wildlife-trade-echidnas-/.
Google Scholar
Wright Dominic, et al. 2015. “Article commentary: the genetic architecture of domestication in animals.” Bioinformatics and Biology Insights 9S4. https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S28902.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S28902
Google Scholar
Wright, Dominic, C‐J. Rubin, Alvaro Martinez Barrio, K. Schütz, Susanne Kerje, Helena Brändström, Andreas Kindmark, Per Jensen, and Leif Andersson. 2010. “The genetic architecture of domestication in the chicken: effects of pleiotropy and linkage.” Molecular Ecology 19(23): 5140-5156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04882.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04882.x
Google Scholar
Wright, Dominic, C. Rubin, K. Schutz, Susanne Kerje, Andreas Kindmark, H. Brandström, Leif Andersson, T. Pizzari, and Per Jensen. 2012. “Onset of sexual maturity in female chickens is genetically linked to loci associated with fecundity and a sexual ornament.” Reproduction in domestic animals 47: 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01963.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01963.x
Google Scholar
Zeder, Melinda A. 2012 “Pathways to animal domestication.” Biodiversity in Agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability 10: 227-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019514.013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019514.013
Google Scholar
, Ngaio Richards
https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5848
English
Język Polski