Man’s Attitude Towards Nature and Animal Respect Questionnaire (AniRe-Que)

Ján  Kaliský; Lada Kaliská

doi:10.21697/seb.2020.18.4.03

Opublikowane: 2020-12-21

Tom 18 Nr 4 (2020)

Kwestionariusz stosunku człowieka do przyrody i szacunku dla zwierząt (AniRe-Que)

Ján Kaliský

, Lada Kaliská

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Dział: Artykuły naukowe

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.4.03

Abstrakt

The psychometric properties of the author´s original tool named Questionnaire of the Relations between a Man and Animals (further on AniRe-Que) was constructed to assess the relations between a man and animals as natural beings; calculated in the form of an R-score (R as respect). The questionnaire is based on the theoretical outcomes of an egalitarian zoocentric, ecoethical position attributing moral statues to all beings, and measures the level of respect expression to nonhuman beings. The aim of this study was to verify its validity and reliability in a research sample of future primary and secondary teachers (N = 500, 62% of females, M_age=22.3; SD=4.1) at Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. Various statistical procedures were used to verify its construct validity (exploratory factor analysis /EFA/) and its convergent/discriminating character, criterion validity, and reliability (test-retest, parallel-forms, internal consistency) to establish satisfactory psychometric properties for the AniRe-Que questionnaire. The questionnaire has possible usage for the animal relation estimation by researchers, practitioners and teachers´ ethical and environmental education intervention effectivitiveness, and also as a form of future international cooperation and verification based on this new instrument.

Słowa kluczowe:

relacja człowiek-zwierzę, kwestionariusz szacunku dla zwierząt (AniRe-Que), właściwości psychometryczne (trafność, rzetelność)

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Kaliský, J. ., & Kaliská, L. (2020). Kwestionariusz stosunku człowieka do przyrody i szacunku dla zwierząt (AniRe-Que). Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 18(4), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.4.03

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioral Science. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Dunlap, Riley E., and Kent D. Van Liere. 1978. “The ‘new environmental paradigm’: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results.” Journal of Environmental Education 9: 10-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
Google Scholar

Gfeller, Fabienne. 2019. “It’s Still an Animal that Died for Me.” Responsibility and Meat Consumption. Europe's Journal of Psychology 15(4): 733-753. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1854
Google Scholar

Hendl, Jan. 2009. Přehled statistických metod. Praha: Portál.
Google Scholar

Kasperbauer, Tyler J. 2018. Subhuman: The moral psychology of human attitudes to animals. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Krajhanzl, Jan. 2014. Psychologie vztahu k přírodě a životnímu prostředí. Brno: MUNI press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7063-2014
Google Scholar

Maršálová, Libuša, and Ondrej Mikšík. 1990. Metodológia a metódy psychologického výskumu. Bratislava: SPN.
Google Scholar

Milfont, Taciano L., and John Duckitt. 2010. “The Environmental Attitudes Inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 80-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
Google Scholar

Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Albert. 1974. Nauka úcty k životu. Praha: Lyra Pragensis.
Google Scholar

Siegrist, Michael. 1996. "Questionnaire of ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes towards the environment." Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 27(4): 290-294.
Google Scholar

Sullivan, Gail M., and Richard Feinn. 2012. “Using Effect Size – or Why the P-Value Is Not Enough.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 4(3): 279-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
Google Scholar

Taylor, Paul W. 1986. Respect for Nature. A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Thompson, Suzanne C. G., and Michaelle A. Barton. 1994. “Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 149-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9
Google Scholar

Urbánek, Tomáš, Denisa Denglerová, and Jan Širuček. 2011. Psychometrika. Měření v psychologii. Praha: Portál.
Google Scholar