Friedrich Hölderlin or Emanuele Severino? The Sacral Dimension of Nature in the Context of Modern Technology

Andrzej Kobylinski

doi:10.21697/seb.2024.03

Published: 2024-02-07

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024)

Friedrich Hölderlin or Emanuele Severino? The Sacral Dimension of Nature in the Context of Modern Technology

Andrzej Kobylinski

Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2024.03

Abstract

The main purpose of inquiries undertaken in this study is to present a synthesis of the views of the German poet Friedrich Hölderlin and the Italian thinker Emanuel Severino on nature and technology, and to analyze the contemporary manifestations of the re-sacralization of nature in many ecological currents, as discussed in her studies by the French philosopher Chantal Delsol. For Hölderlin, nature is never limited to being an empirical object of scientific investigation. It is a divine reality that does not undergo change. It is a space inhabited by the sacred. Nature constitutes the sacred All, beyond which nothing else exists. Severino, in turn, analyzes the impact of modern technology on nature, man and the entire existing world. He believes science and modern technology have become an extremely effective tool of man’s dominion over the natural world. The Italian philosopher says that today the human will to power applied to nature leads to its objectification and desacralization. Delsol, on the other hand, points out that throughout Western culture we are now witnessing the birth of a new religion of nature, which is a modern form of ancient paganism. The analyses performed demonstrate that, on the one hand, nature is currently being subjected to profound changes due to science and technology, while on the other – its former sacral character is being restored, forming the foundation of a new form of religiosity.

Keywords:

nature, technology, ecophilosophy, environmental philosophy, religion, religion and ecology, secularization, nihilism, atheism, pantheism

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Kobylinski, A. (2024). Friedrich Hölderlin or Emanuele Severino? The Sacral Dimension of Nature in the Context of Modern Technology. Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae, 22(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2024.03

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Brencio, Francesca. 2013. “Foundation and poetry. Heidegger as a reader of Hölderlin.” Studia Philosophiae Christianae 49(4): 180-200.
Google Scholar

Brianese, Giorgio. 2014. “Sentiamo e sperimentiamo di essere eterni:” Emanuele Severino interprete di Spinoza. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Google Scholar

Czerniecki, Jan. 2023. “Hölderlin. Aojda w świecie (post)chrześcijańskim [Hölderlin. Aojda in the (post)Christian world].” Teologia Polityczna Co Tydzień 25(375). Accessed September 16, 2023. https://teologiapolityczna.pl/tpct-375.
Google Scholar

Delsol, Chantal. 2023. Koniec świata chrześcijańskiego [The end of the Christian world]. Translated by Piotr Napiwodzki. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.
Google Scholar

Dzwonkowska, Dominika. 2020. “Environmental Vices as Ethical and Anthropological Roots of the Environmental Crisis.” Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 18(5): 171-180. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.15
Google Scholar

Fontanta, Stefano. 2020. “Severino, il nichilista che attaccava il nichilismo.” La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana. Accessed January 24, 2020. https://www.lanuovabq.it/it/severino-il-nichilista-che-attaccava-il-nichilismo.
Google Scholar

Guardini, Romano. 1939. Hölderlin. Weltbild und Frömmigkeit. Leipzig: Verlag Jakob Hegner.
Google Scholar

Haas, Agnieszka. 2023. “Hölderlin – poeta «jednego i wszystkiego» [Hölderlin – the poet of ‘one and everything’].” Teologia Polityczna Co Tydzień 25(375). Accessed September 16, 2023. https://teologiapolityczna.pl/hölderlin-poeta-jednego-i-wszystkiego-1.
Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich. 1976. Pod brzemieniem mego losu. Listy – Hyperion [Under the burden of my fate. Letters – Hyperion]. Translated by Anna Milska and Wanda Markowska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Czytelnik.
Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich. 1986. Der Tod des Empedokles. Ditzingen: Reclam Verlag.
Google Scholar

Kobyliński, Andrzej. 2014. O możliwości zbudowania etyki nihilistycznej. Propozycja Gianniego Vattima [On the possibility of building a nihilistic ethics. Gianni Vattimo's proposal]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
Google Scholar

Kobyliński, Andrzej. 2016a. “Is atheism winnig in Europe? The future of Christianity in the Western world.” Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej 15(2): 79-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/rtk.2016.15.2.05
Google Scholar

Kobyliński, Andrzej. 2016b. “Sekularyzacja religii w twórczości Rainera Marii Rilkego i Gianniego Vattima [Secularization of religion in the works of Rainer Maria Rilke and Gianni Vattimo].” Studia Philosophiae Christianae 52(3): 27-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/2016.52.3.02
Google Scholar

Kobyliński, Andrzej. 2020. “Czym jest sakralny wymiar natury? Filozoficzna interpretacja twórczości Friedricha Hölderlina w dziełach Romano Guardiniego [What is the sacred dimension of nature? A philosophical interpretation of the work of Friedrich Hölderlin in the works of Romano Guardini].” Studia Philosophiae Christianae 56(1): 5-25. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2020.56.1.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2020.56.1.01
Google Scholar

Kućko, Wojciech. 2021. “Wyzwania etyczne «teologii dobrobytu» w świetle nauczania papieża Franciszka [Ethical challenges of the ‘theology of prosperity’ in the light of the teaching of Pope Francis].” Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN 15: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.31743/snt.8796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/snt.8796
Google Scholar

Meotti, Giulio. 2021. Il dio verde. Ecolatria e ossessioni apocalittiche. Macerata: Liberilibri Editrice.
Google Scholar

Pitari, Paolo. 2023. “Emanuele Severino and the lógos of téchne: An Introduction.” History of European Ideas published May 3, 2023: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2023.2207217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2023.2207217
Google Scholar

Sadowski, Ryszard. 2018. “The importance of the humanities in shaping a realistic relationship between humans and nature.” Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 16(3): 5-18. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2018.16.3.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2018.16.3.01
Google Scholar

Sadowski, Ryszard. 2023. “Roots of (and Solutions to) our Ecological Crisis. A Humanistic Perspective.” Ecological Civilization,1(1)10001: 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.35534/ecolciviliz.2023.10001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/ecolciviliz.2023.10001
Google Scholar

Severino, Emanuele. 1998. Il destino della tecnica. Milano: Rizzoli.
Google Scholar

Severino, Emanuele. 2009. Democrazia, tecnica, capitalismo. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Google Scholar

Severino, Emanuele, and Santo Pettinato. 2011. “Technics, Nihilism, Truth.” Annali d'italianistica 29: 107-122.
Google Scholar

Severino, Emanuele, and Edoardo Boncinelli. 2008. Dialogo su etica e scienza. Milano: San Raffaele.
Google Scholar

Tomatis, Francesco. 2020. “Severino, il nuovo Parmenide che scommetteva sull'eterno.” Avvenire 16: 18.
Google Scholar