Radical Pacifism, Limited Pacifism or Just War? (A Response to Professor Jacek Hołówka)

Adam Cebula

doi:10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.12

Opublikowane: 2024-12-31

Tom 60 Nr 2 (2024)

Radical Pacifism, Limited Pacifism or Just War? (A Response to Professor Jacek Hołówka)

Adam Cebula

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

Dział: Artykuły naukowe

https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.12

Abstrakt

This article formulates a critical response to Professor Jacek Hołówka’s opinion on (the philosophical debate about) the morality of war. It is claimed that by rejecting the plausibility of any argument justifying the occasional permissibility of military action. Hołówka finds it difficult to avoid (tacitly) endorsing some form of pacifism. In its radical version – presumably most closely matching Hołówka’s apparent position on war ethics – pacifism is shown to be completely unsupported by any serious social or political theory. More extensive analysis is focused on a compromise version of pacifism proposed recently by David Rodin. Described as “the middle ground between pacifism and just war theory,” Rodin’s proposal permits military resistance to genocidal violence while banning all other types of war, specifically defensive wars waged by invaded states. As closer scrutiny indicates, the view is based on faulty analogies, it disregards the reasonably expected increase in human rights abuses following most invasions, and it underestimates the natural inclinations of some aggressor states to embrace murderous methods of subjugating the populations of the annexed territories. What is more, the limited pacifism Rodin promotes is bound to effectively incapacitate sovereign states even when they confront unquestionably genocidal aggression (in most cases preceded by a purely political “takeover” of the attacked country). This paper concludes by endorsing the states’ traditional right to self-defence: granted only to “minimally just societies,” it turns out to be the most credible safeguard against conventional military aggression and its possible calamitous escalations – the threat of the latter being all too often grossly underrated by pacifists.

-----------------------------------------

Received: 31/05/2024. Reviewed: 10/09/2024. Accepted: 27/09/2024.

Słowa kluczowe:

Jacek Hołówka, military aggression, right to self-defence, genocide;, pacifism, just war theory

Inne teksty tego samego autora

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Cebula, A. (2024). Radical Pacifism, Limited Pacifism or Just War? (A Response to Professor Jacek Hołówka). Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 60(2), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.12

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Cebula, A. (2020a). Collective Complicity in War Crimes. Some Remarks on the Principle of Moral Equality of Soldiers. Philosophia, 48, 1313-1332. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-020-00208-3.
Google Scholar

Cebula, A. (2020b). Fighting a Just War in the Midst of an Unreasonable International Strife: World War I and the Collapse of the Central European System of the Triple Imperial Dominion. Journal of Military Ethics, 19(2), 135-150.
Google Scholar

Dobos, N. (2020). Ethics, Security, and The War-Machine. The true cost of the Military. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Fabre, C., Lazar, S. (eds.). (2014). The Morality of Defensive War. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Goertzel, T.G. (1989). “The Causes of World War III”: Thirty Years Later. Sociological Forum, 4(2), 241-246.
Google Scholar

Hołówka, J. (2021a). O państwie wynegocjowanym. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Hołówka, J. (2021b). O polityce przemocy. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Howe, I. (1959). Review of ‘The Causes of World War III.’ Dissent, 6, 191-196.
Google Scholar

Hughes, H.S. (1959). A Politics of Peace: Reflections on C. Wright Mills’s “The Causes of World War III”. Commentary. The monthly magazine of opinion, (February). https://www.commentary.org/articles/h-hughes-2/a-politics-of-peacereflections-on-c-wright-millss-the-causes-of-world-war-iii/.
Google Scholar

Łubieński, T. (1978). Bić się, czy nie bić? O polskich powstaniach. Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Mills, C.W. (1958). The Causes of World War Three. Simon and Schuster.
Google Scholar

Orend, B. (2013). The Morality of War. Broadview Press.
Google Scholar

Rodin, D. (2002). War and Self-Defense. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Rodin, D. (2014). The Myth of national Self-Defence. In C. Fabre, S. Lazar (eds.), The Morality of Defensive War (69-89). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Walzer, M. (2015). Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Williams, B. (2002). Foreword. In D. Rodin, War and Self-Defense (vii-ix). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Żuradzki, T. (2007). Patriotyzm jest jak rasizm (Patriotism is like racism). Gazeta Wyborcza, 191, (17 sierpnia 2007), 19.
Google Scholar