THE SIGNIFICANCE OF INTEREST FOR ACTIVE LEGITIMATION IN ROMAN CIVIL PROCEDURE

Anton Guzhva

doi:10.21697/zp.2023.23.2.09

Opublikowane: 2023-07-10

Tom 23 Nr 2 (2023)

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF INTEREST FOR ACTIVE LEGITIMATION IN ROMAN CIVIL PROCEDURE

Anton Guzhva

Zeszyty Prawnicze

Dział: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/zp.2023.23.2.09

Abstrakt

The aim of this article is to examine the importance of interest for an applicant’s right to legal protection in Roman civil procedure. I establish a connection between the interest of the authorized person and his right to sue or apply for an interdict by reviewing the sources of Roman law concerning a claim for theft or on the grounds of a contract of mandate or actio ad exhibendum, as well as interdicts on the protection of posession. This enables me to define the persons with a right to enjoy these forms of procedural protection thanks to having a proven interest. Thus, the contractor who is robbed of the subject of his contract had the right to sue for theft, since he was responsible for the safekeeping of the thing. So, too, was the creditor of a pledge, since he had an interest in owning the subject of the pledge. The applicant for a right to actio ad exhibendum needed to have an interest in the presentation of the thing, regardless of whether he was its owner. The person entitled to bring an action on the grounds of a contract of mandate was the principal, if he had an interest in the execution of the commission. Interest was also the necessary condition for an applicant to claim a right to the quod vi aut clam interdict, which could be granted not only to the owner of the thing, but also to other persons whose interests were infringed.

Słowa kluczowe:

active legitimation;, interest; , lawsuit; , protection of interest;, the right to sue; , action for thef; , action for mandate; , actio ad exhibendum;, Roman law;, Roman civil procedure.

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Guzhva, A. (2023). THE SIGNIFICANCE OF INTEREST FOR ACTIVE LEGITIMATION IN ROMAN CIVIL PROCEDURE. Zeszyty Prawnicze, 23(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.21697/zp.2023.23.2.09

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Albertario E., Ancora sulla pecuniarietà dell’interesse nelle obbligazioni, «Il Foro Italiano» 61.4/1936, p. 209-220.
Google Scholar

Bartoshek M., Rimskoe pravo: ponyatiya, terminy, opredeleniya, Moskva 1989.
Google Scholar

Betti E., Id quod interest, «Novissimo Digesto Italiano» vol. 8, Torino 1962.
Google Scholar

Buckland W.W., A Text-Book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, Cambridge 1963.
Google Scholar

Cabra A., Interesse ad agire e zone di interesse (Standing to sue and zones of interest), «Civil Procedure Review», mar./jun. 1.1/2010, p. 154-181.
Google Scholar

Comoglio L.P., Azione ed interesse. Rinnovate suggestioni di un’antica disputa, Vita e Pensiero, «Pubblicazioni dell’Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore JUS», 1/2014, p. 111-136.
Google Scholar

Dozhdev D., Osnovanie zashity vladeniya v rimskom prave, Moskva 1996.
Google Scholar

Du Plessis P., Textbook on Roman Law, Oxford 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198736226.001.0001
Google Scholar

Fargnoli I., Studi sulla legittimazione attiva all’interdetto vi aut clam, Milano 1998.
Google Scholar

Garbagnati E., Azione e interesse, «Jus» 2-3/1955, p. 316-50.
Google Scholar

Ghirga M.F., Interesse ad agire, «Diritto-on-line» [dir. proc. civ.] 2015: http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/interesse-ad-agire-dir-proc-civ.
Google Scholar

Guzhva A.M., Kategoriya «interes» i pozov z kradizhki (actio furti) u rimskomu pravi, «Naukovij visnik Hersonskogo derzhavnogo universitetu. Seriya «Yuridichni nauki» 5.1/2015, p. 91-101.
Google Scholar

Kaser M., “Quanti ea res est”. Studien zur Metode der Litisaestimation im klassischen römischen Recht, Mϋnchen 1935.
Google Scholar

Medicus D., Id quod interest. Studien zum römischen Recht des Schadensersatzes, Köln- Graz 1962.
Google Scholar

Parenti L., Notatione sulla legittimazione attiva all’actio furti per i frutti del fondo dato in locatione al colono, «Seminarios Complutenses de Derecho Romano» 28/2015, p. 783-808.
Google Scholar

Provera G., Diritto e azione nell’esperienza giuridica romana, «Collana della Rivista di Diritto Romano. Scritti giuridici». 2001, p. 1-14: http://www.ledonline.it/rivistadirittoromano/scrittiprovera.html
Google Scholar

Sanfilippo C., Corso di diritto romano. Il mandato. Parte prima, «Rivista di Diritto romano» 4/2004, p. 1-49.
Google Scholar

Satta S., Diritto processuale civile, Milano 1981.
Google Scholar

Schieder C., Interesse und Sachwert. Zur Konkurrenz zweier Grundbegriﬀe des römischen Rechts, Göttingen 2011.
Google Scholar

Smith W., Actio ad Exhibendum, [in:] A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, ed. J. Murray, London 1875, p. 511-512.
Google Scholar

Steiner R.C., Interesse positivo e interesse negative: a reparação de danos no Direito Privado Brasiliero, São Paulo 2016.
Google Scholar

Tafaro S., Recensione a H. Honsell, ‘Quod interest’ im ‘bonae-fidei-iudicium’. Studien zum römischen Schadensersatzrecht, «Index» 2/1969, 359 pp.
Google Scholar

Valditara G., Dall’aestimatio rei all’id quod interest nell’applicazione della condemnatio aquiliana, [in:] La responsabilità civile da atto illecito nella prospettiva storico-comparatistica: I Congresso internazionale, ARISTEC, Madrid, 7-10 ottobre 1993, ed. L. Vacca, Torino 1995, p. 76-87.
Google Scholar

Watson A., Contract of mandate in Roman law, Oxford 1984.
Google Scholar

Zimmermann R., Te law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition, Oxford 1990.
Google Scholar