Pubblicato il: 2016-09-20

DWUGŁOS W SPRAWIE POJĘCIA ŚWIADCZENIA W POLSKIM PRAWIE CYWILNYM – WYMOGI ŚWIADCZENIA

Marek Antas , Jakub M. Łukasiewicz
Zeszyty Prawnicze
Sezione: Artykuły
https://doi.org/10.21697/zp.2015.15.4.01

Abstract

This paper has been constructed on the basis of a dialogue between J.M. Łukasiewicz and M. Antas. In its first part the authors explain the notion of behaviour that satisfies a creditor’s interest which deserves legal protection and its relation to the notion of behaviour consistent with the content of an obligation, on the example of provisions concerning the valorisation of a service. They point out the inconsistency of the notions of due service and undue service under Article 410 of the Polish Civil Code. They also argue that every service leads to a benefit. Their discussion is concluded by an open question: to which category should the execution of a service be attributed – factual actions or legal actions?

Regole di citazione

Antas, M., & Łukasiewicz, J. M. (2016). DWUGŁOS W SPRAWIE POJĘCIA ŚWIADCZENIA W POLSKIM PRAWIE CYWILNYM – WYMOGI ŚWIADCZENIA. Zeszyty Prawnicze, 15(4), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.21697/zp.2015.15.4.01

##plugins.themes.libcom.share##


##plugins.themes.libcom.BOCookieBarText##